Difference between revisions of "Discussion"
From Testiwiki
m |
m |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| − | |||
* [[Discussion structure]] | * [[Discussion structure]] | ||
* [[Discussion method]] | * [[Discussion method]] | ||
| − | + | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragma-dialectics Pragma-dialectical argumentation theory] | |
---- | ---- | ||
Interesting, but somewhat outdated text on editing discussions, argumentation structures, and argument types was archived, and can be found at [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Discussion&oldid=8721]. | Interesting, but somewhat outdated text on editing discussions, argumentation structures, and argument types was archived, and can be found at [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Discussion&oldid=8721]. | ||
Revision as of 04:49, 21 April 2009
This page is a encyclopedia article.
The page identifier is Op_en2382 |
|---|
| Moderator: [[category:Moderator:Jouni]][[user:Jouni|Jouni]] [[moderators#Jouni|(see all)]] |
|
Give your opinion to the peer rating of the content of this page. |
| Upload data
|
<section begin=glossary />
- Discussion is a part of an attribute of a formally structured object. In discussion, anyone can raise any relevant points about the property that the attribute describes. Discussion is organised using the pragma-dialectical argumentation theory[1]. A discussion usually consists of three parts: 1) the explication of a dispute; 2) the actual discussion, which is organised as hierarchical threads of arguments; and 3) the resolution.
<section end=glossary />
See also
Interesting, but somewhat outdated text on editing discussions, argumentation structures, and argument types was archived, and can be found at [1].
- ↑ Eemeren, F.H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
