Difference between revisions of "Emission assessment of small-scale energy production in the Helsinki metropolitan area"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Results)
m (Results)
Line 265: Line 265:
  
 
Costs:
 
Costs:
 
{| {{prettytable}}
 
| .
 
| Base Scenario
 
| Scenario 1-Base Scenario
 
| Scenario 2-Base Scenario
 
| Base Scenario-Scenario 1 nuclear
 
| Base Scenario-Scenario 2 nuclear
 
|----
 
| Commersial life time [a]
 
| 20
 
| 20
 
| 20
 
| 20
 
| 20
 
|----
 
| Revenue [%]
 
| 5,0
 
| 5,0
 
| 5,0
 
| 5,0
 
| 5,0
 
|----
 
| Annual instalment factor [%]
 
| 8,02 %
 
| 8,02 %
 
| 8,02 %
 
| 8,02 %
 
| 8,02 %
 
|----
 
| Price of emission right [€/tCO2]
 
| 23,0
 
| 23,0
 
| 23,0
 
| 23,0
 
| 23,0
 
|----
 
| Building cost [M€]
 
| 0,0
 
| 147,8
 
| 197,9
 
| 147,8
 
| 197,9
 
|----
 
| Investment cost [M€/a]
 
| 0,00
 
| 11,86
 
| 15,87
 
| 11,86
 
| 15,87
 
|----
 
| Emission trading cost[M€]
 
| 0,0
 
| 23,5
 
| 32,0
 
| 19,0
 
| 27,5
 
|----
 
| Reduction of fine particle emission  [t]
 
| 23,7
 
| 343,2
 
| 451,1
 
| 347,0
 
| 454,6
 
|----
 
| Fine particle reduction cost [€/kgPM2,5]
 
| 0,000
 
| 68,436
 
| 71,030
 
| 54,637
 
| 60,502
 
|----
 
|}
 
  
 
=== Conclutions ===
 
=== Conclutions ===

Revision as of 10:10, 25 May 2009


Scope

Purpose

This assessments purpose is to evaluate greenhouse gas emissions and cost which are caused by small-scale energy production in Helsinki Metropolitan Area. In this assessment small-scale energy production means other used heating methods than district heating and those district heating units, which thermal energy output is less than 50 MW.

Also nuclear plant potential to produce thermal energy to district heating network of Helsinki and affects are assessed.

Boundaries

  • Spatial: Helsinki Metropolitan Area (Helsinki, Espoo, Vantaa, Kauniainen).
  • Emissions: CO2, PM2.5.
  • Heating methods:
    • District heating
    • The others
  • Fuels: All (H/L oil, Pellet, Chip, Gas, Coal).
  • Other impacts: Costs
    • directly from the activity itself of the greenhouse trade
    • new district heating extension costs

Scenarios

Common to the all scenarios:

  • No new small-scale district heating units
  • Other used heating method fractions of each others are same as in 2007

Base scenario:

  • District heating network will be same as in 2007, but need of thermal energy increases, because of inhabitant increase in Helsinki Metropolitan area
    • No expansion to the network


Scenario 1:

  • District heating buildings floor area fraction of the total floor area in cities is same as in 2007
    • 665 km expansion to the network

Scenario 2:

  • District heating buildings floor area fraction of the total floor area in cities increases same rate as between years 2000 and 2008
    • 890 km expansion to the network

Intented users

  • Local district heating distributors in Helsinki Metropolitan Area
  • Participants of the | World Wide Views on Global Warming stakeholder meetings
  • Participants of the COP-15 meeting in Copenhagen
  • City-level policy-makers in all sectors in Helsinki Metropolitan Area as well as everywhere else
  • International policy-makers related to climate change
  • General public
  • Scientists working on climate change and related fields of study

Participants

  • The Assessment and Modeling unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare of Finland, THL.
    • Jouni Tuomisto (leading researcher, person in chrage)
    • Pasi Sorsa (assisting researcher, executing the assessment)
  • Funded by Bioher-project

Definition

Gabi 4.3 - life cycle assessment software model parameters: File:Parameters, gabi-model.xls.

All the starting value and cost calculations made in the excel file; File:Assessment of small-scale energy production in Helsinki Metropolitan area.zip

Decision variables

Indicator variables

  • Cost and profit
  • Emissions

Other variables

  • Outdoor temperature
  • Housing stock
  • Consumption of heat
  • Structure of thermal energy production

Indicies

  • Time: Years 2007, 2013, 2020 and 2030.

Analyses

  • Analyses for small scale district heating plants and other used heating methods in Helsinki Metropolitan Area
    • fine particles PM2.5 and CO2 emissions
    • costs

Result

Results

Base scenario: District heating network is the same as in 2007.

Emissions:

Small scale district heating units 2007 2013 2020 2030 2020 nuclear 2030 nuclear
Carbon dioxide [1000*t] 23,736901 25,05452635 26,33543565 27,21867413 26,33548213 27,21867413
PM2,5 [t] 0,223085076 0,235691789 0,247576112 0,255774353 0,247577401 0,255774353
Other used heating methods 2007 2013 2020 2030 2020 nuclear 2030 nuclear
Carbon dioxide [1000*t] 799,3583443 1013,841363 1242,266809 1484,627024 1242,266809 1484,627024
PM2,5 [t] 500,5342257 638,6252512 785,3273172 930,4654844 785,3273172 930,4654844

2020 Nuclear and 2030 Nuclear in the table are emissions for situations, where the new nuclear plant is built to Loviisa and connected to district heating network of Helsinki.

Scenario 1: District heating network is expanded so, that district heating buildings fraction of the total floor area in cities are same as in 2007 in Helsinki Metropolitan area .

Emissions:

Small scale district heating units 2007 2013 2020 2030 2020 nuclear 2030 nuclear
Carbon dioxide [1000*t] 23,736901 25,05452635 26,33543565 27,21867413 26,33548213 27,21867413
PM2,5 [t] 0,223085076 0,235691789 0,247576112 0,255774353 0,247577401 0,255774353
Other used heating methods 2007 2013 2020 2030 2020 nuclear 2030 nuclear
Carbon dioxide [1000*t] 799,3583443 824,0900228 852,9439137 894,163926 852,9439137 894,163926
PM2,5 [t] 500,5342257 513,8023322 529,2818828 551,3956202 529,2818828 551,3956202


Scenario 2: Buildings, which use district heating, floor area fraction of the total floor area in cities increases as in figure 1.

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Figure 1. Buildings, which use district heating, floor area fraction of the total floor area. Increase is estimated to be as it has been between years 2000-2008.

Emissions:

Small scale district heating units 2007 2013 2020 2030 2020 nuclear 2030 nuclear
Carbon dioxide [1000*t] 23,736901 25,05452635 26,33543565 27,21867413 26,33548213 27,21867413
PM2,5 [t] 0,223085076 0,235691789 0,247576112 0,255774353 0,247577401 0,255774353
Other used heating methods 2007 2013 2020 2030 2020 nuclear 2030 nuclear
Carbon dioxide [1000*t] 799,3583443 762,2642232 731,6912344 681,4132806 731,6912344 681,4132806
PM2,5 [t] 500,5342257 479,6810885 461,526094 432,2396894 461,526094 432,2396894

Costs:

Conclutions

Main purpose of this assessment was to calculate what kind of emissions small scale energy production units of district heating and other heating methods than district heating in Helsinki Metropolitan area would have in 2013, 2020 and 2030. Secondary purpose of this assessment was to estimate emission trading affects to production costs of the district heating units and what affects would possible new nuclear plant have.

Consumption of district heating has been around 12 TWh each year in Helsinki Metropolitan area. In this assessment calculated that total consumption of thermal energy will increase about 940 TWh in Helsinki Metropolitan area. If district heating fraction of the total energy production would be remain at 2007 level, the district heating consumption would be increased 615 GWh. This would mean 27 GWh increase each year in consumption of district heating, which has been 40 GWh/a last 8 years.

See also

Thermal energy need in Helsinki Metropolitan Area

Gabi 4.3 - life cycle assessment software

District heating production units in Helsinki metropolitan area

References