Difference between revisions of "End user evaluation"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(first questions added)
(removed old school stuff)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[op_fi:Kuluttaja-arvio metyylielohopeasta ja omega-3-rasvahapoista kalassa|Kuluttaja-arvio metyylielohopeasta ja omega-3-rasvahapoista kalassa]]
 
{{study|moderator=Jouni}}
 
{{study|moderator=Jouni}}
  
==End user questionnaire==
+
'''Please answer this questionnaire below to help us improve Opasnet and its contents.''' .
  
'''Questionnaire about Opasnet
+
See also [[:op_fi:Kuluttaja-arvio metyylielohopeasta ja omega-3-rasvahapoista kalassa|the case study part of this evaluation in Finnish]].
* Rate the following properties (1= really poor 5=very good)
 
** Search functionalities
 
** Easiness to find stuff
 
** Easiness of use from technical point of view
 
** Quality of content
 
** Amount of content
 
** Easiness to see whether some information is reliable (mature) or not (draft)
 
** Overall potential of Opasnet to become a major source of environmental health information.
 
* Is it easy to navigate through the system if you start from the main page?
 
* Is it easy to navigate through the system if you start from a random page?
 
  
'''Questions about open assessment
+
==End user questionnaire==
* Rate the following properties (1= really poor 5=very good)
 
** Clarity of objects and object structure
 
** Potential of the idea of openness to actually work
 
 
 
 
 
'''Questions about the fish case
 
* What do you think of the results?
 
** Reliability?
 
** New information or insights?
 
* What do you think of the assessment?
 
** Clarity?
 
** Easiness to follow the logic?
 
 
 
'''Other questions
 
* Have use used any other wiki system
 
** by reading contents and searching?
 
** by contributing information?
 
 
 
==Opasnet analytics==
 
 
 
The statistics of user visits and contributions in Opasnet, Heande, and Beneris wiki are studied.
 
* Which pages are being used the most?
 
* Who are the main users (readers)?
 
* Who are the main contributors (contribution scores)?
 
* What is the impact of advertisement (of particular pages)?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
==Scope==
 
  
How do the end users see the current status and future prospects of Opasnet? Specifically, the terms are used with these interpretations:
+
===Important background reading===
* End user: a person using Opasnet from one of the following groups:
+
'''Opasnet website'''<br/>
** researchers (producing scientific information),
+
Please look around starting from [[Main Page]]''' (especially the part [[Main Page#Active assessments|Active assessments]]), and also some popular pages such as [[Opasnet]], [[Welcome to Opasnet]], [[Glossary]] or [[Open assessment workshop 2009]].<br/>
** [risk] assessors (producing assessments),
+
<br/>'''Open assessment method'''<br/>
** authorities (utilising assessments),
+
Good pages to look at before answering these questions are [[Open assessment]], [[Open assessor]], [[Variable]], [[Variable structure]], [[Assessment]], [[Assessment structure]], and [[Universal object]]
** experts of an area related to Opasnet content,
+
<br/><br/>'''Case study'''<br">
** NGO representatives and other activists,
+
Case study: [[Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish]]
** general public and other interested individuals.
 
* Opasnet: a web workspace with the following parts or functionalities:
 
** Opasnet wiki (a website for mass collaboration),
 
** Opasnet Base (a database for data and results),
 
** open assessment (a method for performing assessments on the Internet),
 
** case studies (actual assessments),
 
** information in variable and encyclopedia pages.
 
* Current status:
 
** The appearance of the website.
 
** The easiness to find information.
 
** The amount of interesting content.
 
** The quality of content.
 
** The utility of the content for end user needs.
 
* Future prospects:
 
** End user expectation that she will use Opasnet for her own needs.
 
 
  
Please answer the questions below by copy-pasting them into an email and sending to olli.leino(at)thl.fi.
+
{{widget:Sandbox}}
  
==Result==
+
{{mfiles}}
 +
__NOEDITSECTION__

Latest revision as of 06:55, 28 October 2009



Please answer this questionnaire below to help us improve Opasnet and its contents. .

See also the case study part of this evaluation in Finnish.

End user questionnaire

Important background reading

Opasnet website
Please look around starting from Main Page (especially the part Active assessments), and also some popular pages such as Opasnet, Welcome to Opasnet, Glossary or Open assessment workshop 2009.

Open assessment method
Good pages to look at before answering these questions are Open assessment, Open assessor, Variable, Variable structure, Assessment, Assessment structure, and Universal object

Case study<br"> Case study: Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish

Template:Widget:Sandbox


<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>