Difference between revisions of "Exposure-response function"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Jouni moved page Exposure-response relationship to Exposure-response function: more widely used term)
(updated but not ready)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{variable|Exposure-response functions}}
+
{{variable|moderator=Jouni}}
 +
[[Category:Exposure-response functions]]
 
[[Category:Glossary term]]<section begin=glossary />
 
[[Category:Glossary term]]<section begin=glossary />
:'''Exposure-response relationship'''(or '''exposure-response function, ERF''')is the relationship between the exposure of a given organism, system, or (sub)population to an agent in a specific pattern during a given time and the magnitude of a continuously graded effect to that organism, system, or (sub)population.
+
:'''Exposure-response function (ERF)''' (or exposure-response relationship) is the relationship between the exposure of a given organism, system, or (sub)population to an agent in a specific pattern during a given time and the magnitude of a continuously graded effect to that organism, system, or (sub)population.
  
 
+
:This term has several related terms that may have slightly different meaning. Effect and response are interchangeable words. Also the word ''function'' is used instead of ''relationship''. In Opasnet, we use the term '''exposure-response function (or ERF)''' as the generic term for different kinds of relationships. Often the exposure metric is more specifically defined in an alternative term. Two common examples:
:This term has several related terms that may have slightly different meaning. Effect and response are interchangeable words. Also the word ''function'' is used instead of ''relationship''.
 
 
:;Concentration-effect relationship: Relationship between the exposure, expressed in concentration, of a given organism, system, or (sub)population to an agent in a specific pattern during a given time and the magnitude of a continuously graded effect to that organism, system, or (sub)population. The concentration is measured at a defined site. <ref name="IPCS_WHO">[http://www.who.int/ipcs/en/ IPCS_WHO]</ref>
 
:;Concentration-effect relationship: Relationship between the exposure, expressed in concentration, of a given organism, system, or (sub)population to an agent in a specific pattern during a given time and the magnitude of a continuously graded effect to that organism, system, or (sub)population. The concentration is measured at a defined site. <ref name="IPCS_WHO">[http://www.who.int/ipcs/en/ IPCS_WHO]</ref>
  
Line 18: Line 18:
 
==Answer==
 
==Answer==
  
An ERF is a mathematical construct describing the relationship between a response and an exposure. In the general form, it is described as a probability
+
An ERF is a mathematical construct describing the relationship between a response and an exposure. In the general form, it is described as a probability.
  
 
==Rationale==
 
==Rationale==
Line 35: Line 35:
 
</t2b>
 
</t2b>
  
==Technical issues==
+
=== Pages with standardised ERF tables ===
 +
 
 +
If a page has a standardised ERF data table (see an example above), the data can be automatically read and used by an R code and combined with other ERF tables. Therefore it is preferable to use the standard format. It makes modelling much easier and also enables an easy way to add more endpoints to assessments, if there are interesting exposures and available ERF tables.
 +
 
 +
The tables can contain the following columns (obligatory columns are in bold):
 +
* Obs (automatic)
 +
* '''Exposure.agent (index)
 +
* '''Disease (index)
 +
* Population (index)
 +
* Age (index)
 +
* Sex (index)
 +
* '''Response.metric (index)
 +
* '''ERF.Parameter (index)
 +
* '''Exposure unit (index)
 +
* '''Exposure route (index)
 +
* '''Exposure metric (index)
 +
* Threshold (result; if omitted, assumed to be 0)
 +
* '''Result (result; may also be named as ERF)
 +
* Description (description, there may be any number of description columns because they are not stored in the database)
 +
 
 +
<t2b name="Standardised ERF tables" index="Page name,Ident" obs="Code name" desc="Description">
 +
ERF of several environmental pollutions|Op_en5827|initiate|Contains ERFs for radon, PM2.5, noise, chlorinated byproducts in drinking water, arsenic, dampness in buildings, formaldehyde, fluoride, ozone, lead, dioxin, quartz dust, asbestos.
 +
</t2b>
 +
 
 +
=== Technical issues ===
  
 
* In [[Opasnet]], the use of term Exposure-response function (ERF) is recommended. The pages about ERFs should be named: "ERF of <agent> on <endpoint> in <population>."
 
* In [[Opasnet]], the use of term Exposure-response function (ERF) is recommended. The pages about ERFs should be named: "ERF of <agent> on <endpoint> in <population>."
* ERFs are typically variables, and they should be categorised to [[:Category:Exposure-response functions]]
+
* ERFs are typically [[variable]]s, and they should be categorised to [[:Category:Exposure-response functions]]
* In the [[definition]] of a variable, an ERF is used as [[data]], not as a variable under the [[causality]] attribute. This is because the causality goes from the exposure to the response, and the true physiological and biochemical variables affecting the response are typically unknown or undescribed. The ERF is merely a mathematical representation of the relationship between the exposure and the response. But it describes a real-world phenomenon and thus is a variable.
+
* In the [[definition]] of a variable, an ERF data is described as a t2b table under subheading [[Data]]. The actual ovariable that is used in models is defined in an "initiate" code under subheading Calculations.  
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 08:28, 18 August 2014

<section begin=glossary />
Exposure-response function (ERF) (or exposure-response relationship) is the relationship between the exposure of a given organism, system, or (sub)population to an agent in a specific pattern during a given time and the magnitude of a continuously graded effect to that organism, system, or (sub)population.
This term has several related terms that may have slightly different meaning. Effect and response are interchangeable words. Also the word function is used instead of relationship. In Opasnet, we use the term exposure-response function (or ERF) as the generic term for different kinds of relationships. Often the exposure metric is more specifically defined in an alternative term. Two common examples:
Concentration-effect relationship
Relationship between the exposure, expressed in concentration, of a given organism, system, or (sub)population to an agent in a specific pattern during a given time and the magnitude of a continuously graded effect to that organism, system, or (sub)population. The concentration is measured at a defined site. [1]
Dose-response relationship
Relationship between the amount of an agent administered to, taken up by, or absorbed by an organism, system, or (sub)population and the change developed in that organism, system,or (sub)population in reaction to the agent. [1]<section end=glossary />

Question

What is such a representation for ERF that it fulfills the following criteria?

  • It is widely applicable to all kinds of agents, exposures, and responses.
  • A single ERF is widely applicable, within its domain, to different situations and populations.
  • It is mathematically clear so that impact calculations can be operationalised based on it.

Answer

An ERF is a mathematical construct describing the relationship between a response and an exposure. In the general form, it is described as a probability.

Rationale

By nature, a response to an agent occurs at individual level (with some exceptions such as agents affecting herd immunity). Thus, the individual response should be the basic unit for ERF. If individual variation is of no interest, a population ERF can simply be expressed as the average of individual ERFs.

Example

An example of how exposure-response functions -table should be filled. Original page: Concentration-response to PM2.5

Difference between revisions of "Exposure-response function"(relative increase of mortality per µg/m3)
ObsDiseaseResponse metricExposure routeExposure metricExposure unitThresholdERF parameterERFDescription
1CardiopulmonaryMortalityInhalationAnnual average outdoor concentrationµq/m30Relative increase0.0128Dockery et al. 1993 and Pope et al. 2002:0.0128 (-0.0036-0.0375)
2Lung cancerMortalityInhalationAnnual average outdoor concentrationµq/m30Relative increase0.0150Dockery et al. 1993 and Pope et al. 2002:0.0150 (-0.0350-0.0728)
3Other causesMortalityInhalationAnnual average outdoor concentrationµq/m30Relative increase0.0008Dockery et al. 1993 and Pope et al. 2002:0.0008 (-0.0232-0.0252)
4All causesMortalityInhalationAnnual average outdoor concentrationµq/m30Relative increase0.0091Dockery et al. 1993 and Pope et al. 2002:0.0091 (-0.0019-0.0289)

Pages with standardised ERF tables

If a page has a standardised ERF data table (see an example above), the data can be automatically read and used by an R code and combined with other ERF tables. Therefore it is preferable to use the standard format. It makes modelling much easier and also enables an easy way to add more endpoints to assessments, if there are interesting exposures and available ERF tables.

The tables can contain the following columns (obligatory columns are in bold):

  • Obs (automatic)
  • Exposure.agent (index)
  • Disease (index)
  • Population (index)
  • Age (index)
  • Sex (index)
  • Response.metric (index)
  • ERF.Parameter (index)
  • Exposure unit (index)
  • Exposure route (index)
  • Exposure metric (index)
  • Threshold (result; if omitted, assumed to be 0)
  • Result (result; may also be named as ERF)
  • Description (description, there may be any number of description columns because they are not stored in the database)
You have error(s) in your data:

You must define units. Please use syntax: unit="unit"
Standardised ERF tables()
ObsPage nameIdentCode nameDescription
1ERF of several environmental pollutionsOp_en5827initiateContains ERFs for radon, PM2.5, noise, chlorinated byproducts in drinking water, arsenic, dampness in buildings, formaldehyde, fluoride, ozone, lead, dioxin, quartz dust, asbestos.

Technical issues

  • In Opasnet, the use of term Exposure-response function (ERF) is recommended. The pages about ERFs should be named: "ERF of <agent> on <endpoint> in <population>."
  • ERFs are typically variables, and they should be categorised to Category:Exposure-response functions
  • In the definition of a variable, an ERF data is described as a t2b table under subheading Data. The actual ovariable that is used in models is defined in an "initiate" code under subheading Calculations.

See also

References