RM analysis Kati Iso-Markku
From Testiwiki
Revision as of 12:54, 9 April 2011 by Kati Iso-Markku (talk | contribs)
Contents
Main Points
Group 1
Perspective of the ministry of Social and Health Affairs
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
Perspective of a journalist
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
Group 2
Perspective of the ministry of Social and Health Affairs
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
Perspective of a journalist
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
Group 3
Perspective of the ministry of Social and Health Affairs
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
Perspective of a journalist
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
Group 4
Perspective of the ministry of Social and Health Affairs
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
Perspective of a journalist
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
Overall Statements
Perspective of the ministry of Social and Health Affairs
Perspective of a journalist
Evaluation of the swine flu/narcolepsy model
- Relevance:
- Pertinence:
- Usability:
- Acceptability:
