Difference between revisions of "Societal Wellbeing"
Iranjon 95 (talk | contribs) (→Participants) |
Iranjon 95 (talk | contribs) (→Survey Analysis) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
When asked how happy they felt the previous day, the results showed 73% rated themselves as seven or more out of 10. | When asked how happy they felt the previous day, the results showed 73% rated themselves as seven or more out of 10. | ||
| − | To the question about leading a worthwhile life, 78% of respondents rated themselves seven or more out of 10. | + | To the question about leading a worthwhile life, 78% of the respondents rated themselves seven or more out of 10. |
'''Happiness spreadsheet''' | '''Happiness spreadsheet''' | ||
| − | Last November Prime Minister David Cameron launched a separate "happiness index" to measure the well-being of UK citizens. | + | Last November, Prime Minister, David Cameron launched a separate "happiness index" to measure the well-being of UK citizens. |
| − | He admitted measuring happiness could be seen as "woolly" and "impractical" but said the £2m scheme was warranted because it was a better way of measuring how the country was doing than using gross domestic product (GDP) - the standard measure of economic activity. | + | He admitted that measuring happiness could be seen as "woolly" and "impractical" but said the £2m scheme was warranted because it was a better way of measuring how the country was doing than using gross domestic product (GDP) - the standard measure of economic activity. |
"You cannot capture happiness on a spreadsheet any more than you can bottle it - and if anyone was trying to reduce the whole spectrum of human happiness into one snapshot statistic I would be the first to roll my eyes," he said at the time. | "You cannot capture happiness on a spreadsheet any more than you can bottle it - and if anyone was trying to reduce the whole spectrum of human happiness into one snapshot statistic I would be the first to roll my eyes," he said at the time. | ||
Revision as of 20:46, 16 April 2012
This page is a assessment.
The page identifier is Op_en5533 |
|---|
| Moderator:Jouni (see all) |
|
Give your opinion to the peer rating of the content of this page. |
| Upload data
|
| Main message: |
|---|
| Question:
what are the important areas to Societal Well-being ? measurement of social, economic and environmental dimensions is way to develop the concern of social well-being. |
it is difficult to identify how the wellbeing of society is evolving, and how it should be measured. it is clear that societal wellbeing measures should include social, economic and environmental dimensions. On 19 July last year, 68 countries joined the Kingdom of Bhutan in co-sponsoring a resolution titled “Happiness: Towards a holistic approach to development,” which was adopted by consensus by the 193-member UN General Assembly. However, is relevant data available to provide a comprehensive depiction for the UK and crucially, to be able to see how wellbeing overall is changing overtime?
Contents
Purpose
Government and non-government officials, politicians, leading economists, scholars, academics and religious leaders are expected to gather to discuss methods the Bhutanese government proposed towards obtaining gross national happiness [1]
- The draft outcome of the meeting includes a report containing a synthesis of discussions, thoughts, views and recommendations following the meeting to be submitted to the UN secretary general, who will then share it with all UN member states.
- Governments worldwide take immediate steps to adopting the new wellbeing and an economic paradigm based on sustainability.
- Recommendations for inclusion into policies the principles of the new economy government worldwide could consider for voluntary adoption were also suggested.
- Promotion of green technologies and poverty alleviation and investments in sustainable infrastructure, like support for green businesses, renewable energy, clean technology and energy efficiency.
Suggestion
Recommendation was developed for inclusion into policies the principles of the new economy government worldwide could consider for voluntary adoption were suggested. The suggestions include
- Promotion of green technologies and poverty alleviation and investments in sustainable infrastructure, like support for green businesses, renewable energy, clean technology and energy efficiency.
- Banning advertising to children to dismantle incentives to excessive consumption, and for governments to introduce work sharing policies that reduce overwork, increase leisure time and prevent layoffs.
- Government procurement from local, organic and fair trade sources, to encourage local economies, and fair trade systems that promote sustainable production methods and fair returns to producers.
- Need to value non-market assets and services to measure progress more accurately and comprehensively, through creation of accounts that value natural, cultural, human and social dynamics.
- Need for ecological tax reforms that tax pollution and depletion of natural capital.
Societal Well-being at Great Britain
The UK government is poised to start measuring people's psychological and environmental wellbeing, bidding to be among the first countries to officially monitor happiness.
Despite "nervousness" in Downing Street at the prospect of testing the national mood amid deep cuts and last week's riot in Westminster, the Office of National Statistics will shortly be asked to produce measures to implement David Cameron's long-stated ambition of gauging "general wellbeing".[2]
UK aims to identify key components of wellbeing and explore existing datasets that could help build a picture of societal wellbeing, quality of life and progress in the UK. The first step to measuring the progress of society is to define wellbeing. In 2006, the Department for Environment and Rural Affairs (DEFRA’s) ‘Whitehall Wellbeing Working Group (membership includes government departments, devolved administrations, the Environment Agency, Improvement and Development Agency for Local Government and the Sustainable Development Commission to steer research, share information, and consider the policy implications of the research into wellbeing) agreed a statement of common understanding of wellbeing for policy makers:
“Wellbeing is a positive, social and mental state; it is not just the absence of pain, discomfort and incapacity. It arises not only from the action of individuals, but from a host of collective goods and relationships with other people. It requires that basic needs are met, that individuals have a sense of purpose, and that they feel able to achieve important personal goals and participate in society. It is enhanced by conditions that include supportive personal relationships, involvement in empowered communities, good health, financial security, rewarding employment and a healthy and attractive environment.”
Survey Analysis
[3] The survey of 4,200 people asked respondents to rank from nought to 10 how satisfied they were and how anxious they felt the previous day.
When asked about how satisfied they were, 76% rated themselves as seven out of 10, where 10 was completely and nought was not at all.
The ONS says they are initial findings.
The UK statistics body added four questions to the ONS household survey, which took place between April and August this year, at the request of the government.
The questions included:
- Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays?
- Overall, how happy did you feel yesterday?
- Overall, how anxious did you feel yesterday?
- Overall, to what extent do you feel the things you do in your life are worthwhile?
When asked how happy they felt the previous day, the results showed 73% rated themselves as seven or more out of 10.
To the question about leading a worthwhile life, 78% of the respondents rated themselves seven or more out of 10.
Happiness spreadsheet
Last November, Prime Minister, David Cameron launched a separate "happiness index" to measure the well-being of UK citizens. He admitted that measuring happiness could be seen as "woolly" and "impractical" but said the £2m scheme was warranted because it was a better way of measuring how the country was doing than using gross domestic product (GDP) - the standard measure of economic activity.
"You cannot capture happiness on a spreadsheet any more than you can bottle it - and if anyone was trying to reduce the whole spectrum of human happiness into one snapshot statistic I would be the first to roll my eyes," he said at the time.
Rational
well-being can be defi ned as a positive mental state. Initially embraced by some psychologists as a means of focusing attention on health and satisfaction with life, rather than on mental illness and its remedies. It has been adopted more widely by a range of social scientists and some policy-makers. Well-being has been defined recently as:
“A dynamic state, in which the individual is able to develop their potential, work productively and creatively, build strong and positive relationships with others, and contribute to their community. It is enhanced when an individual is able to fulfi l their personal and social goals and achieve a sense of purpose in society.” (Government Office for Science, 2008, 10)
It is associated with such qualities as confidence, optimism about the future, a sense of influence over one's own destiny and the social competence that promote satisfying and supportive relationship with other people and not simply with an absence of diagnosed illness, disability or dissatisfaction. It also critically involves the resilense needed to deal with hard time as and when they occur. in policy terms it can be defined as the condition which allow individuals and communities to flourish.
Definition
Upload a causal diagram and change the right name here.
Decision variables
* Decision variables: decisions that are considered.
Indicators
* Indicators: outcome variables of interest.
Value variables
* Value variables: value judgements (usually about indicators).
Other variables
* Other variables: any variables that link to the causal network and are within the boundaries of the assessment.
Analyses
* Analyses: statistical and other analyses that contain two or more variables, e.g. optimizing.
Indices
* Indices: lists of particular locations along spatial, temporal, or other dimensions.
Result
* Results of indicators and assessment-specific analyses.
Results
Conclusions
* Conclusions are based on the results, given the scope.
