Search results

Create the page "Users" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• Defining the users of an assessment
  '''Users and use purposes of the method''' A spectrum of different potential users of the new risk assessment method can be described e.g. as:
  3 KB (405 words) - 13:17, 3 August 2008
• Intended users
  27 bytes (3 words) - 23:24, 6 June 2008

Page text matches

• From risk assessment to decisions in the EU and the US
  #Downstream users are brought into the system. ...ses which are made known to the manufacturer or importer by his downstream users and which the manufacturer or importer includes in his assessment.
  28 KB (4,037 words) - 11:12, 20 August 2014
• Testiwiki:Privacy policy
  ...the wiki servers and can be seen by Opasnet's server administrators and by users who have been granted "CheckUser" access. Your IP address, and its connecti ...re using a public machine and don't wish to expose your username to future users of the machine. (If so, clear the browser cache as well.)
  10 KB (1,647 words) - 08:02, 13 February 2012
• Testiwiki:General disclaimer
  ...on the part of [[THL]] or any of its agents, members, organizers or other users.
  3 KB (435 words) - 16:53, 9 May 2011
• Welcome to Opasnet
  ...ed is a learning process between assessors and the audience, the practical users of the information. This was not a unique idea, as the need had been identi ..., we had a continuous lack of participation even in projects where the key users of the assessment were involved. The problem was partly about tools that we
  17 KB (2,781 words) - 10:47, 27 August 2014
• Value judgement tool
  ...estion about how to organise issues so that feedback is collected from the users.
  8 KB (1,463 words) - 11:56, 7 February 2008
• PUrE
  ...models and tools, linked to a variety of GIS enabled datasets, to help end-users to conduct assessments, ranging from simple screening studies, to detailed
  2 KB (288 words) - 08:16, 18 June 2009
• Catastrophic non-linear impacts of climate change
  ===Intended users===
  3 KB (434 words) - 11:06, 13 March 2009
• Benefit-risk assessment of fish consumption for Beneris
  === Intended users ===
  12 KB (1,657 words) - 09:41, 29 January 2011
• Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland
  |+ '''Fish consumption among fish users according to Tero Hirvonen, 2007 (g/d). ...own into three steps. In the first step fish intake distributions for fish users were determined based on data in <ref name="Tero" />. Here, for a given spe
  6 KB (650 words) - 09:23, 3 January 2012
• Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland
  |+ '''Fish consumption in the subpopulation of fish users (g/d). ...sh species among all individuals in a certain sex/age group (users and non-users). The resulting distributions were further grouped and combined (first by a
  8 KB (1,178 words) - 09:32, 3 January 2012
• Risks and benefits related to consumption of vegetables
  ===Intended users===
  2 KB (322 words) - 11:18, 13 March 2009
• Henvinet (project)
  ...ion in collaboration with main stakeholders, with emphasis on the needs of users of information, more than of those producing it. To allow for efficient dat
  4 KB (520 words) - 19:08, 22 November 2009
• Help:Heande structure
  #* Description and management of Heande users: Located in the User namespace
  2 KB (323 words) - 22:21, 18 December 2007
• Benefit-risk assessment on farmed salmon
  ===Intended users=== * The primary users are public health authorities and decision-makers involved in giving food r
  8 KB (1,016 words) - 11:32, 13 March 2015
• Testiwiki:Structure of project contents
  ...hat describes the content and usage of the folder. Except for projects and users, all folders are further divided by year (four digits as the name of the su *users (a personal folder for users; should only be used for doctoral studies or similar personal content)
  5 KB (832 words) - 07:16, 4 November 2009
• Guidebook
  ::::[[Defining the users of an assessment]]
  19 KB (2,420 words) - 11:41, 24 October 2008
• Applying general information
  During this phase the users collect all readily available parts belonging to the scope of the assessmen
  2 KB (264 words) - 13:01, 3 August 2008
• Designing variables
  ...tors are the variables of most interest from the point of view of the use, users and other audiences of the assessment. The idea thus behind the indicator s
  7 KB (1,157 words) - 08:57, 2 December 2008
• Drawing a causal diagram
  **Indicators, i.e. the variables of most interest to the users of the outputs ...esting variables within the assessment scope from the point of view of the users and other audiences of the assessment output and what decision options are
  3 KB (485 words) - 13:19, 9 December 2008
• Issue framing tool
  ...ve functionalities for issue framing: defining a) the purpose, b) expected users, c) main questions, and d) boundaries of the assessment. Technically this i
  7 KB (1,042 words) - 13:15, 3 August 2008
• Reporting an assessment
  ...rmation created in the assessment is compiled and conveyed to the intended users. *Communication with users & stakeholders
  1 KB (129 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Reporting tool
  # Scope: Purpose, Boundaries, Scenarios, Optimizing, Analyses, Intended users, Participants (min required, max allowed)
  2 KB (207 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Scoping an assessment
  *The users, uses and possible other interested audiences of the assessment outputs *Collection of information and views through consultation of intended users and other stakeholders
  1 KB (193 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Defining the users of an assessment
  '''Users and use purposes of the method''' A spectrum of different potential users of the new risk assessment method can be described e.g. as:
  3 KB (405 words) - 13:17, 3 August 2008
• Contribution tool
  '''Contribution tool''' enables the users to provide contributions that maintain their content unchanged in time. The
  6 KB (947 words) - 11:42, 24 October 2008
• Gasbus - health impacts of Helsinki bus traffic
  ===Intended users===
  4 KB (525 words) - 20:56, 17 February 2010
• Collaborative workspace
  ...open groups to participate in risk assessments. It is an interface for the users to access the toolbox contents, make their contributions to the assessment ...ture of the content. Furthermore, the collaborative workspace provides the users access to the tools that they can use for making their contributions. Basic
  3 KB (418 words) - 13:15, 3 October 2008
• Assessment
  ! Intended use and users
  6 KB (985 words) - 07:58, 5 March 2015
• Evaluating assessment performance
  ** availability - observed access to assessment information by intended users ** acceptability of premises - (assumed) acceptance of premises by intended users, or others interested, or affected
  9 KB (1,312 words) - 12:02, 26 March 2009
• General assessment processes
  ...anipulation, and synthesis sub-processes among assessment participants and users ...ticular interest, and assessment-specific analyses are communicated to the users of the outputs. The results are discussed and conclusions are made about th
  20 KB (2,854 words) - 15:47, 29 January 2011
• Participating in assessments
  ...ractices still remain in the form of closed processes, where contacts with users are reduced to minimum, collaboration within the community of experts is ra ...and decision making processes; assessors themselves and decision makers as users of the assessments. The prevailing assessment tradition is that assessments
  38 KB (5,608 words) - 18:17, 8 April 2011
• Quality assurance and quality control
  model developers and users: (a) subject their model to credible, objective peer review; (b) assess * If users want to edit pages, they must register and give their real name either in t
  8 KB (1,253 words) - 14:56, 4 November 2009
• Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish
  === Intended users ===
  6 KB (855 words) - 11:22, 14 April 2011
• Heande
  ...ile the participation and usage of information in [[Opasnet]] is free, the users of [[Heande]] must accept its basic rule: the usage of information ''within The users of [[Heande]] must accept one basic rule:
  7 KB (1,113 words) - 09:46, 17 November 2009
• Evaluating performance of environmental health assessments
  ...luence on their use as well as making. On the one hand, evaluation informs users e.g. regarding the possible and appropriate uses of models and assessment o ...sessors should not end in completion of the output. On the other hand, the users of the outputs should not expect realization of the outcomes without having
  63 KB (8,880 words) - 16:20, 4 March 2015
• Monte Carlo Risk Assessment, July 2007
  MCRA is intended for users who want to analyze their own consumption and chemical concentration data.
  5 KB (702 words) - 11:28, 20 August 2014
• Cost-benefit analysis on composite traffic in the Helsinki Metropolitan area
  === Intended users===
  2 KB (291 words) - 07:07, 23 March 2010
• Testiwiki:Restructuring pyrkilo websites
  ...net.org'''. In addition, we will use opasnet.fi and opasnet.eu to redirect users to the actual site. The different wikis such as heande and tyjak will be mo ...e easy, and the structure of the system guides both the developers and the users.
  7 KB (1,191 words) - 07:16, 4 November 2009
• Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL)
  === Intended users ===
  23 KB (3,077 words) - 07:19, 30 January 2011
• Question
  ...it contains the research question but also participants, intended use and users, boundaries, and scenarios. For details, see [[assessment]].
  1 KB (166 words) - 04:18, 4 January 2013
• Participant
  ...[[attribute|subattribute]] of the [[assessment]]. See also [[Defining the users of an assessment]].<section end=glossary />
  687 bytes (94 words) - 07:10, 6 June 2008
• Risk assessment of nitrate in drinking water
  === Intended users ===
  10 KB (1,149 words) - 16:07, 29 January 2011
• Pyrkilo
  ...ting]]''' the assessment: Communicating the results and conclusions to the users. ...open groups to participate in risk assessments. It is an interface for the users to access the system contents, make their contributions to the assessment a
  65 KB (9,370 words) - 11:37, 20 November 2009
• Performance
  ==Performance evaluation by users== Users are the ultimate evaluators of an object. To facilitate this, it is useful
  4 KB (617 words) - 06:30, 15 November 2009
• BIOHER assessment
  === Intended users ===
  8 KB (1,053 words) - 11:36, 13 March 2015
• Assessment on Institute of Public Health and Welfare
  ===Intended users===
  7 KB (1,008 words) - 17:12, 30 September 2009
• Open assessment in research
  ...net organises and interprets information that is useful for the individual users (i.e., you!).
  12 KB (1,838 words) - 10:32, 22 July 2009
• Opasnet
  | Same, but we insist the modifiers to register as users. Additionally some of the pages have been protected so that only the draft
  18 KB (2,736 words) - 10:48, 27 August 2014
• Open assessment on the location of burden of greenhouse gas trade
  ===Intended users===
  7 KB (1,153 words) - 10:42, 19 September 2008
• Help:Analytica conventions in open assessment
  * The window size for modules should be as small as possible. Users may want to keep several windows open.
  7 KB (1,182 words) - 12:08, 6 April 2011

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)