Difference between revisions of "Talk:Composite traffic"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Trips per hour scope discussion added)
(Trips per hour: signatures added)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Statement = Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
 
Statement = Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
 
Outcome = Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
 
Outcome = Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
Argumentation ={{Attack| The focus  is ambiguous. It should be mentioned that the trips are only composite trips, not all. Rewording is needed.}}
+
Argumentation ={{Attack| The focus  is ambiguous. It should be mentioned that the trips are only composite trips, not all. Rewording is needed.|Juha}}
  
:{{Defend| Focus should be short and easily understandable. Details about the essence of the variable should be in the scope, not in the focus.}}
+
:{{Defend| Focus should be short and easily understandable. Details about the essence of the variable should be in the scope, not in the focus.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 22:33, 17 September 2006 (EEST)}}
  
::{{Attack| This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".}}
+
::{{Attack| This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".|Juha}}
 
}}
 
}}
  
Line 21: Line 21:
 
Statement = Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction.|
 
Statement = Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction.|
 
Outcome = |
 
Outcome = |
Argumentation ={{Defend| Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.}}
+
Argumentation ={{Defend| Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.|Juha}}
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 19:33, 17 September 2006

Trips per hour

About the focus

How to read discussions

Statements:

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

The focus is ambiguous. It should be mentioned that the trips are only composite trips, not all. Rewording is needed.: Juha {{{3}}}

Focus should be short and easily understandable. Details about the essence of the variable should be in the scope, not in the focus.: --Jouni 22:33, 17 September 2006 (EEST) {{{3}}}
This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".: Juha {{{3}}}


Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction

How to read discussions

Statements:

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.: Juha {{{3}}}