|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Trips per hour==
| |
| | | | |
| − | ====About the focus====
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{Resolution|
| |
| − | Topic = Focus: Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area.|
| |
| − | Statement = Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
| |
| − | Outcome = Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
| |
| − | Argumentation ={{Attack| The focus is ambiguous. It should be mentioned that the trips are only composite trips, not all. Rewording is needed.}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :{{Defend| Focus should be short and easily understandable. Details about the essence of the variable should be in the scope, not in the focus.}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::{{Attack| This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".}}
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ====Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction====
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{Resolution|
| |
| − | Topic = Scope: Trips of one working day, based on year 2000 data. Private car trips as the starting point; 50% of them were assumed to switch to composite traffic.|
| |
| − | Statement = Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction.|
| |
| − | Outcome = |
| |
| − | Argumentation ={{Defend| Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.}}
| |
| − | }}
| |
