Difference between revisions of "Talk:Composite traffic"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Trips per hour scope discussion added)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
====About the focus====
 
====About the focus====
 
Focus: "Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area"
 
  
 
{{Resolution|
 
{{Resolution|
 +
Topic = Focus: Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area.|
 
Statement = Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
 
Statement = Total number of trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
 
Outcome = Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
 
Outcome = Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area|
Line 13: Line 12:
  
 
::{{Attack| This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".}}
 
::{{Attack| This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".}}
 +
}}
 +
 +
====Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction====
 +
 +
 +
{{Resolution|
 +
Topic = Scope: Trips of one working day, based on year 2000 data. Private car trips as the starting point; 50% of them were assumed to switch to composite traffic.|
 +
Statement = Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction.|
 +
Outcome = |
 +
Argumentation ={{Defend| Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.}}
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 06:26, 12 September 2006

Trips per hour

About the focus

How to read discussions

Statements:

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

The focus is ambiguous. It should be mentioned that the trips are only composite trips, not all. Rewording is needed.: {{{2}}} {{{3}}}

Focus should be short and easily understandable. Details about the essence of the variable should be in the scope, not in the focus.: {{{2}}} {{{3}}}
This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".: {{{2}}} {{{3}}}


Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction

How to read discussions

Statements:

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

(A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.: {{{2}}} {{{3}}}