Talk:Composite traffic

Trips per hour

About the focus

How to read discussions

Statements: Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation: ⇤ The focus is ambiguous. It should be mentioned that the trips are only composite trips, not all. Rewording is needed.: {{{2}}} {{{3}}} ← Focus should be short and easily understandable. Details about the essence of the variable should be in the scope, not in the focus.: {{{2}}} {{{3}}} ⇤ This alternative is almost as short, so the argument does not hold: "Total number of composite trips travelled per hour in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area".: {{{2}}} {{{3}}}

Scope should not contain assumptions about composite fraction

How to read discussions

Statements: Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation: ← Assumption of composite fraction is of a very detailed operational nature, and it should not be in the scope.: {{{2}}} {{{3}}}