Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mercury and methyl mercury concentrations in fish"
(Parameters corrected) |
(Parameters corrected) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| − | | | + | |Statements= Author judgement about the chosen distribution |
| − | | | + | |Resolution= |
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
| − | {{comment| | + | {{comment|1|Justifiable procedure in author judgement would be to use name(s) of the author(s) used --> here e.g. (Leino O., 2007). Scientific information should always be citable. |--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 16:51, 20 November 2007 (EET)}}}} |
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| − | | | + | |Statements= Rationale behind the chosen distribution |
| − | | | + | |Resolution= |
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
| − | {{defend| | + | {{defend|1|Explanation of the rationale about the chosen distribution is highly useful and justifiable.|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 17:17, 20 November 2007 (EET)}} |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:11, 16 November 2009
moved from Beneris:Variable Talk:Concentrations of nutrients and pollutants in fish -- Jouni 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET)
Should the variable restrict to Finland?
| Statements: Variable should restrict to Finland.
Resolution: Not accepted. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤1: It is easier to compare results when they are in one place. In addition, often the fish don't follow national boundaries. --Jouni 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET) |
Number of samples
| Statements: Enough number of samples?Needs editing
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
⇤1: There are species with only two samples. Is this enough? --Olli 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)
|
| Statements: Author judgement about the chosen distribution
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
--1: Justifiable procedure in author judgement would be to use name(s) of the author(s) used --> here e.g. (Leino O., 2007). Scientific information should always be citable. --Anna Karjalainen 16:51, 20 November 2007 (EET) |
| Statements: Rationale behind the chosen distribution
Resolution: Resolution not yet found. (A stable resolution, when found, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←1: Explanation of the rationale about the chosen distribution is highly useful and justifiable. --Anna Karjalainen 17:17, 20 November 2007 (EET) |
