Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mercury and methyl mercury concentrations in fish"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Parameters corrected)
(redirected to the article page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== moved from [[:Beneris:Variable Talk:Concentrations of nutrients and pollutants in fish]] -- [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET) ==
+
#REDIRECT [[Mercury and methyl mercury concentrations in fish]]
 
 
==Should the variable restrict to Finland?==
 
 
 
{{discussion
 
|Statements= Variable should restrict to Finland.
 
|Resolution= Not accepted.
 
|Argumentation =
 
{{attack|1|It is easier to compare results when they are in one place. In addition, often the fish don't follow national boundaries.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET)}}
 
}}
 
 
 
== Number of samples ==
 
 
 
{{discussion
 
|Statements= Enough number of samples?{{needs editing}}
 
|Resolution=
 
|Argumentation =
 
{{attack|1|There are species with only two samples. Is this enough?|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}}
 
:{{attack|2|For the most consumed species (e.g. salmon and herring), there are at least eight samples, which should be enough.|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}}
 
}}
 
 
 
 
 
{{discussion
 
|Statements= Author judgement about the chosen distribution
 
|Resolution=
 
|Argumentation =
 
{{comment|1|Justifiable procedure in author judgement would be to use name(s) of the author(s) used --> here e.g. (Leino O., 2007). Scientific information should always be citable. |--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 16:51, 20 November 2007 (EET)}}}}
 
 
 
 
 
{{discussion
 
|Statements= Rationale behind the chosen distribution
 
|Resolution=
 
|Argumentation =
 
{{defend|1|Explanation of the rationale about the chosen distribution is highly useful and justifiable.|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 17:17, 20 November 2007 (EET)}}
 
}}
 

Latest revision as of 12:57, 19 April 2017