|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | == moved from [[:Beneris:Variable Talk:Concentrations of nutrients and pollutants in fish]] -- [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET) ==
| + | #REDIRECT [[Mercury and methyl mercury concentrations in fish]] |
− | | |
− | ==Should the variable restrict to Finland?==
| |
− | | |
− | {{discussion
| |
− | |Statements= Variable should restrict to Finland.
| |
− | |Resolution= Not accepted.
| |
− | |Argumentation =
| |
− | {{attack|1|It is easier to compare results when they are in one place. In addition, often the fish don't follow national boundaries.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:23, 10 February 2008 (EET)}}
| |
− | }}
| |
− | | |
− | == Number of samples ==
| |
− | | |
− | {{discussion
| |
− | |Statements= Enough number of samples?{{needs editing}}
| |
− | |Resolution=
| |
− | |Argumentation =
| |
− | {{attack|1|There are species with only two samples. Is this enough?|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}}
| |
− | :{{attack|2|For the most consumed species (e.g. salmon and herring), there are at least eight samples, which should be enough.|--[[User:Olli|Olli]] 15:22, 17 September 2007 (EEST)}}
| |
− | }}
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | {{discussion
| |
− | |Statements= Author judgement about the chosen distribution
| |
− | |Resolution=
| |
− | |Argumentation =
| |
− | {{comment|1|Justifiable procedure in author judgement would be to use name(s) of the author(s) used --> here e.g. (Leino O., 2007). Scientific information should always be citable. |--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 16:51, 20 November 2007 (EET)}}}}
| |
− | | |
− | | |
− | {{discussion
| |
− | |Statements= Rationale behind the chosen distribution
| |
− | |Resolution=
| |
− | |Argumentation =
| |
− | {{defend|1|Explanation of the rationale about the chosen distribution is highly useful and justifiable.|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 17:17, 20 November 2007 (EET)}}
| |
− | }}
| |