Difference between revisions of "Talk:PM2.5 concentration from bus traffic in Helsinki in 2020"
From Testiwiki
(New section: Units in formula not clear -- ~~~~) |
Juha Villman (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
{{comment|#(2): |The units for the variable are not clearly the result of the inputs or the formula. Each term in the formula should have its units listed.|--[[User:Jgrellier|Jgrellier]] 13:49, 21 February 2008 (EET)}} | {{comment|#(2): |The units for the variable are not clearly the result of the inputs or the formula. Each term in the formula should have its units listed.|--[[User:Jgrellier|Jgrellier]] 13:49, 21 February 2008 (EET)}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{comment|#(3): |Agreed, including the units in the formula allows you to check the coherence of the formula|--[[User:Miranda|Miranda]]}} | ||
Revision as of 11:54, 21 February 2008
Formula not self-explanatory -- Jouni 13:22, 21 February 2008 (EET)
--#(number): : The formula is not self-explanatory. The abbreviations should be explained. If the formula does not contain all details, there should be a link to e.g. a model that the user can access and evaluate. --Jouni 13:22, 21 February 2008 (EET)
Re: Formula not self-explanatory -- Jgrellier 13:46, 21 February 2008 (EET)
--#(number): : Done - terms in formulae explained --Jgrellier 13:46, 21 February 2008 (EET)
Units in formula not clear -- Jgrellier 13:49, 21 February 2008 (EET)
--#(2): : The units for the variable are not clearly the result of the inputs or the formula. Each term in the formula should have its units listed. --Jgrellier 13:49, 21 February 2008 (EET)
--#(3): : Agreed, including the units in the formula allows you to check the coherence of the formula --Miranda
