Difference between revisions of "Assessment studies"
(Created page with "{{study|moderator=Heta|stub=Yes}} ==Pragmatic knowledge services== Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 17, no. 3 (2011), 472-497 submitted: 30/10/10, accepted: 28/1/11,...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Pragmatic knowledge services== | ==Pragmatic knowledge services== | ||
| − | Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 17, no. 3 (2011), 472-497 submitted: 30/10/10, accepted: 28/1/11, appeared: 1/2/11 © J.UCS; Mikko V. Pohjola, Pasi Pohjola, Sami Paavola, Merja Bauters, Jouni T. Tuomisto | + | Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 17, no. 3 (2011), 472-497 submitted: 30/10/10, accepted: 28/1/11, appeared: 1/2/11 © J.UCS; Mikko V. Pohjola, Pasi Pohjola, Sami Paavola, Merja Bauters, Jouni T. Tuomisto |
===Abstract=== | ===Abstract=== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
and its users, are not only means for creation of practical knowledge, but vehicles of a cultural | and its users, are not only means for creation of practical knowledge, but vehicles of a cultural | ||
change from individualistic perceptions of knowledge work towards mediated collaboration. | change from individualistic perceptions of knowledge work towards mediated collaboration. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Read the whole study [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/extensions/mfiles/mf_getfile.php?anon=true&docid=3467&docver=1&fileid=3474&filever=1&filename=jucs_17_03_0472_0497_pohjola.pdf here]. | ||
===Keywords=== | ===Keywords=== | ||
Collective knowledge, Trialogical approach, Innovation, Knowledge practices, Pragmatism, Collaborative knowledge services, Open assessment, Opasnet, Innovillage, KP-Lab, KPE | Collective knowledge, Trialogical approach, Innovation, Knowledge practices, Pragmatism, Collaborative knowledge services, Open assessment, Opasnet, Innovillage, KP-Lab, KPE | ||
Revision as of 12:21, 11 April 2012
This page is a study.
The page identifier is Op_en5534 |
|---|
| Moderator:Heta (see all) |
| This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page, and then a rating bar will appear here. |
| Upload data
|
Pragmatic knowledge services
Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 17, no. 3 (2011), 472-497 submitted: 30/10/10, accepted: 28/1/11, appeared: 1/2/11 © J.UCS; Mikko V. Pohjola, Pasi Pohjola, Sami Paavola, Merja Bauters, Jouni T. Tuomisto
Abstract
Knowledge, innovations and their implementation in effective practices are essential for development in all fields of societal action, e.g. policy, business, health, education, and everyday life. However, managing the interrelations between knowledge, innovation and practice is complicated. Facilitation by suitable knowledge services is needed. This paper explores the theory of converging knowledge, innovation, and practice, discusses some advances in information systems development, and identifies general requirements for pragmatic knowledge services. A trialogical approach to knowledge creation and learning is adopted as a viable theoretical basis. Also three examples of novel knowledge services Opasnet, Innovillage, and Knowledge Practices Environment (KPE), are presented. Eventually, it is concluded that pragmatic knowledge services, as hybrid systems of information technology and its users, are not only means for creation of practical knowledge, but vehicles of a cultural change from individualistic perceptions of knowledge work towards mediated collaboration.
Read the whole study here.
Keywords
Collective knowledge, Trialogical approach, Innovation, Knowledge practices, Pragmatism, Collaborative knowledge services, Open assessment, Opasnet, Innovillage, KP-Lab, KPE
