Difference between revisions of "Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(variable list corrected)
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 
{{Risk assessment of MeHg and n-3 fatty acids in fish}}
 
  
 
===Decision variables===
 
===Decision variables===
Line 36: Line 34:
 
===Indicators===
 
===Indicators===
  
*[[Variable:Benefit-risk estimate of omega-3 and methyl mercury from fish]]
+
*[[Intelligence quotient change in children in Beneris]]
  
 
===Other variables===
 
===Other variables===
  
*[[Variable:Concentrations of nutrients and pollutants in fish]]
+
'''Environmental variables
*[[Variable:Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women]]
+
*[[Concentrations of beneficial nutrients in fish]]
*[[Variable:Domestic fish consumption of the general population]]
+
*[[Mercury and methyl mercury concentrations in fish]]
*[[Variable:Body weight]]
+
 
*[[Variable:Exposure to methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acid due to fish consumption]]
+
'''Exposure variables
*[[Variable:Exposure-response of omega-3 for IQ boost]]
+
*[[Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland]]
*[[Variable:Exposure-response of methyl mercury for IQ loss]]
+
*[[Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland]]
 +
*[[Fish oil intake in Beneris]]
 +
*[[Methyl mercury intake from fish in Beneris]]
 +
 
 +
'''Population characteristics
 +
*[[Body weight in Finland]]
 +
 
 +
'''Exposure-response functions
 +
*[[ERF of methyl mercury on intelligence quotient]]
 +
*[[ERF of omega-3 fatty acids on intelligence quotient]]
  
 
===Indices===
 
===Indices===

Revision as of 13:21, 15 February 2008

The Analytica model file contains the actual calculations for this assessment. The actual code created with the ana-wiki converter can be found from [1].

Scope

Purpose

This assessment evaluates the effects of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids on development of IQ in children. The source of exposure is Finnish fish consumption.

Boundaries

  • Population of Finland
  • Current situation


Scenarios

This study is a business-as-usual, i.e. a burden-of-disease assessment with only one decision scenario. D↷

This project is supposed to serve as a case study to represent the utilization of the pyrkilo method.

Intended users

Participants

  • Beneris researchers

Definition

Decision variables

  • None

Indicators

Other variables

Environmental variables

Exposure variables

Population characteristics

Exposure-response functions

Indices

Fish species
  • Farmed_salmon(sea+inland)
  • Wild_salmon(sea)
  • Herring_(sea)
  • White_fish(sea)
  • Sprat(sea)
  • Perch(sea)
  • Flounder(sea)
  • Pike-perch(sea)
  • Bream(sea)
  • Pike(sea)
  • Vendace(sea)
  • Burbot(sea)
  • Wild_salmon(inland)
  • White_fish(inland)
  • Perch(inland)
  • Pike-perch(inland)
  • Bream(inland)
  • Pike(inland)
  • Vendace(inland)
  • Burbot(inland)


Analyses

Interesting population subgroups for exposure might be:

  • pregnant women with high fish consumption (e.g. 0.95 percentile of fish consumption data of pregnant women)
  • pregnant women with average fish consumption (e.g. mean fish consumption of pregnant women)
  • pregnant women with very low or no fish consumption (e.g. 0.05 percentile of fish consumption data of pregnant women)
  • general Finnish population with normal fish consumption (as a comparison to the pregnant women scenarios)

Result

Results

Conclusions