Changing ambient UVR and future skin cancer in London, Rome and Helsinki: melanoma skin cancer (CMM)
[[Category: ]]
This page is a assessment.
The page identifier is Op_en5333 |
---|
Moderator:iranjon_95 (see all) |
This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page, and then a rating bar will appear here. |
Upload data
|
Add at least one category above.
Add moderator to the template above.
It is widely accepted that ambient UVR is carcinogenic (Lucas et al 2006). This assessment will focus on the impact on malignant melanoma skin cancer (CMM).
The international mechanism for protecting the ozone layer is the “Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer” that came into force in 1989 and its subsequent amendments (UNEP 2006). The production of the most harmful ozone depleting substances (ODS) are now phased out worldwide. The atmospheric concentrations of these gases is anticipated to decline over the next decades (IPCC 2005). As a result stratospheric ozone is expected to increase and, subsequently, ambient UVR is anticipated to decrease. Hence, a decrease in melanoma skin cancer is expected, but other factors may play an important role as well such as the ageing of the population.
Contents
Question
What is imocat of the malignant melanoma skin cancer
Purpose
* Purpose defines the specific information need of the decision-making and the research question that is asked.
Boundaries
* Boundaries define which parts of the reality are taken into the assessment and which are excluded within spatial, temporal and other dimensions.
Scenarios
* Scenarios define particular conditions that are of interest irrespective whether they describe reality or not (e.g. what-if scenarios).
Intended users
* Intended users are those for whom the assessment is made.
Participants
* Participants are those who may participate in the making of the assessment. The minimum group of people for a successful assessment is always described. If some groups must be excluded, this must be explicitly motivated.
Definition
Upload a causal diagram and change the right name here.
Decision variables
* Decision variables: decisions that are considered.
Indicators
* Indicators: outcome variables of interest.
Value variables
* Value variables: value judgements (usually about indicators).
Other variables
* Other variables: any variables that link to the causal network and are within the boundaries of the assessment.
Analyses
* Analyses: statistical and other analyses that contain two or more variables, e.g. optimizing.
Indices
* Indices: lists of particular locations along spatial, temporal, or other dimensions.
Result
* Results of indicators and assessment-specific analyses.
Results
Conclusions
* Conclusions are based on the results, given the scope.