Difference between revisions of "Energy balance"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Rationale)
Line 44: Line 44:
 
===Calculations===
 
===Calculations===
 
===Rationale===
 
===Rationale===
 +
 +
====New description====
 +
 +
* Energy balances are described as input = output on a coarse level (called classes) where the structure is the same or similar to the OECD energy balance tables. If possible, this is described on the Energy balance method level and it is shared by all cities.
 +
* On more detailed (variable level in the matrix), the fraction of each variable of the total class are described separately. Fractions are city specific and they are described on city level in a separate table.
 +
* Based on the fraction table, detailed equations with variables are created. The format will be fraction * class total = variable.
 +
* The last fraction has zero degrees of freedom when the class total is given. However, it must have a variable and thus a row in the fraction table. The result for that variable is an empty cell (which results in NA).
 +
* Unlike in the previous version, all variables are given either as values or equations, and the user interface is not used for BAU. In contrast, user interface or decision table may be used to derive values for alternative scenarios.
 +
* To make this work, the city-specific fraction data must be defined as ovariable (so that it can be changed with a decision table), and also the energy balance method must be described asa ovariable. How are we going to make the two interplay, as we may want to have several cities?
 +
** Define one city ovariable and evaluate energy balance with that. The ovariable has a generic name. Then, define a new city ovariable with the same name and re-evaluate the energy balance ovariable; this must be done so that the two cities are appended rather than replaced.
 +
** city ovariables are appended first into a large fraction table, and then that is used to create the large energy balance matrix. {{defend|# |This is clearly better.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 17:09, 21 February 2013 (EET)}}
 +
* The city-specific ovariable may have Iter and other indices. A separate matrix is created and solved for each unique combination of indices. This makes it possible to have a very flexible approach.
 +
* We should check if the energy balance matrix (see Matti's Excel) has city-specific equations. If possible, energy transformations are described as generic equations on the energy balance method.
 +
* Structure of OECD Energy balance tables (data):
 +
** Fuel (given as observation columns in OECD table)
 +
** Activity (row in OECD table)
 +
** Description
 +
* Structure of the generic process table
 +
** Equation,
 +
** Col,
 +
** Result,
 +
** Description? {{attack|# |This does not join up in a coherent way.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 17:09, 21 February 2013 (EET)}}
 +
* Columns for fraction table
 +
** Class
 +
** Item
 +
** Result (fraction)
 +
** Indices as needed
 +
 +
====Old description====
 +
 
{{attack|# |What are other energy sources,i wish it should be specific,how about air transport,does it included in the energy balance calculation?|--[[User:Sam0911|Sam0911]] 16:29, 10 February 2013 (EET)}}
 
{{attack|# |What are other energy sources,i wish it should be specific,how about air transport,does it included in the energy balance calculation?|--[[User:Sam0911|Sam0911]] 16:29, 10 February 2013 (EET)}}
  

Revision as of 15:09, 21 February 2013



# : Don't put arguments on the same line as a subheading. Check the subheadings, you have some that are not used in methods. --Jouni 22:46, 12 February 2013 (EET)# : amended according to the comment --Sam0911 10:36, 17 February 2013 (EET)


  • The energy calculation based on two core concepts
      1.Energy production or source
      2.Energy consumption



Question

How to calculate energy balances?

--# : Clear question --Sam0911 10:28, 17 February 2013 (EET)

Purpose

where is the purpose?

Boundaries

no info about bouderies?

Procedure

# : No information about the procedure of the assessment? --Sam0911 10:13, 17 February 2013 (EET)

Management

# No information about the management of the assessment?: --Sam0911 10:13, 17 February 2013 (EET) {{{3}}}

Rationale

Input

Output

Data

Calculations

Rationale

New description

  • Energy balances are described as input = output on a coarse level (called classes) where the structure is the same or similar to the OECD energy balance tables. If possible, this is described on the Energy balance method level and it is shared by all cities.
  • On more detailed (variable level in the matrix), the fraction of each variable of the total class are described separately. Fractions are city specific and they are described on city level in a separate table.
  • Based on the fraction table, detailed equations with variables are created. The format will be fraction * class total = variable.
  • The last fraction has zero degrees of freedom when the class total is given. However, it must have a variable and thus a row in the fraction table. The result for that variable is an empty cell (which results in NA).
  • Unlike in the previous version, all variables are given either as values or equations, and the user interface is not used for BAU. In contrast, user interface or decision table may be used to derive values for alternative scenarios.
  • To make this work, the city-specific fraction data must be defined as ovariable (so that it can be changed with a decision table), and also the energy balance method must be described asa ovariable. How are we going to make the two interplay, as we may want to have several cities?
    • Define one city ovariable and evaluate energy balance with that. The ovariable has a generic name. Then, define a new city ovariable with the same name and re-evaluate the energy balance ovariable; this must be done so that the two cities are appended rather than replaced.
    • city ovariables are appended first into a large fraction table, and then that is used to create the large energy balance matrix. # : This is clearly better. --Jouni 17:09, 21 February 2013 (EET)
  • The city-specific ovariable may have Iter and other indices. A separate matrix is created and solved for each unique combination of indices. This makes it possible to have a very flexible approach.
  • We should check if the energy balance matrix (see Matti's Excel) has city-specific equations. If possible, energy transformations are described as generic equations on the energy balance method.
  • Structure of OECD Energy balance tables (data):
    • Fuel (given as observation columns in OECD table)
    • Activity (row in OECD table)
    • Description
  • Structure of the generic process table
    • Equation,
    • Col,
    • Result,
    • Description? # : This does not join up in a coherent way. --Jouni 17:09, 21 February 2013 (EET)
  • Columns for fraction table
    • Class
    • Item
    • Result (fraction)
    • Indices as needed

Old description

# : What are other energy sources,i wish it should be specific,how about air transport,does it included in the energy balance calculation? --Sam0911 16:29, 10 February 2013 (EET)

Use a table where different fuel types are columns and different stocks, energy production processes, or consumption types are rows called Energy accounts (Ene.account for short). See also an example File:Energy supply in Europe.xls. All Ene.accounts and fuel types used are listed on Energy consumption classes.

A part of a full energy balance sheet (ktoe/a).
Coal and peat Crude oil Petrochemical products Electricity Heat
Production and supply of primary energy
Production 129
Import 28 63
Export
Conversion of primary energy to use
Transfers
Electricity plants
CHP plants -129 -28 61 96
Final energy consumption
Industry
Road transport 54
Heating 10 96
Other energy use 9 51

Energy balance can be considered as double-entry bookkeeping. The production and conversion are typically credit (i.e., where the energy comes from), while consumption is debit (i.e., where the energy is used). In a typical case, both credit and debit are marked positive on the energy balance sheet. However, there are activities that convert one fuel to another, so that the energy is moved from one column to another. In this case, credit (the source) is marked negative and debit (the target) is marked positive. This is because the production and conversion rows together should reflect how much energy is actually available for final consumption. In other words, the sum of production and conversion rows should equal the sum of the consumption rows in every column.

Because production + conversion = consumption, also production = consumption - conversion. These equations are used to derive the supply that is needed to fulfil the demand.

--# : it seems the formula is ok,the code also runs --Sam0911 16:33, 10 February 2013 (EET)=== Formula ===

Default run key: qffJP3u5RpFw1GuL

Amount of renewable fuels compared with peat (may be over 1):

Consumption of process heat produced by industry itself:

Consumption of electricity by households:

Consumption of electricity by industry:

Consumption of electricity by commerce:

Consumption of electricity by municipality:

Consumption of district heat by households:

Consumption of district heat by industry:

Consumption of district heat by commerce:

Consumption of district heat by municipality:

+ Show code

The model first creates the matrix (and shows it to the user if the user has defined intermediates = TRUE), and then it fills all empty cells with 0 and solves it by using the input values the user has given via the user interface. (The user interface can later be replaced by another model.) All the current input values are final consumptions. The example interface and values are based on the Kuopio data, but they are not stored as a part of the ovariable.

--# : good to have a reference to compare --Sam0911 16:12, 10 February 2013 (EET)==See also==

Urgenche research project 2011 - 2014: city-level climate change mitigation
Urgenche pages

Urgenche main page · Category:Urgenche · Urgenche project page (password-protected)

Relevant data
Building stock data in Urgenche‎ · Building regulations in Finland · Concentration-response to PM2.5 · Emission factors for burning processes · ERF of indoor dampness on respiratory health effects · ERF of several environmental pollutions · General criteria for land use · Indoor environment quality (IEQ) factors · Intake fractions of PM · Land use in Urgenche · Land use and boundary in Urgenche · Energy use of buildings

Relevant methods
Building model · Energy balance · Health impact assessment · Opasnet map · Help:Drawing graphs · OpasnetUtils‎ · Recommended R functions‎ · Using summary tables‎

City Kuopio
Climate change policies and health in Kuopio (assessment) · Climate change policies in Kuopio (plausible city-level climate policies) · Health impacts of energy consumption in Kuopio · Building stock in Kuopio · Cost curves for energy (prioritization of options) · Energy balance in Kuopio (energy data) · Energy consumption and GHG emissions in Kuopio by sector · Energy consumption classes (categorisation) · Energy consumption of heating of buildings in Kuopio · Energy transformations (energy production and use processes) · Fuels used by Haapaniemi energy plant · Greenhouse gas emissions in Kuopio · Haapaniemi energy plant in Kuopio · Land use in Kuopio · Building data availability in Kuopio · Password-protected pages: File:Heat use in Kuopio.csv · Kuopio housing

City Basel
Buildings in Basel (password-protected)

Energy balances
Energy balance in Basel · Energy balance in Kuopio · Energy balance in Stuttgart · Energy balance in Suzhou


Related files

<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>