Difference between revisions of "Environmental impact assessment directive"
m (→See also: links to related material) |
m (→See also) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* [[Openness in participation, assessment, and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health: a review of literature and recent project results]] | * [[Openness in participation, assessment, and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health: a review of literature and recent project results]] | ||
* [[State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Environmental health]] | * [[State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Environmental health]] | ||
| + | * [[:heande:Assessment of impacts to environment and health in influencing manufacturing and public policy]] (suojattu, julkaisematon käsikirjoitus) | ||
==Keywords== | ==Keywords== | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 14 November 2012
This page is a assessment.
The page identifier is Op_en5851 |
|---|
| Moderator:Nobody (see all) Click here to sign up. |
| This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page, and then a rating bar will appear here. |
| Upload data
|
Adopted 25 years ago, the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (known as the EIA Directive) should be adapted to reflect the experience gained as well as changes in EU legislation and policy, and European Court of Justice case law. The EIA Directive has been identified as a potential instrument for a future simplification exercise (COM(2009)15).[1]
Contents
Scope
Question
What should the updated EIA directive contain?
Answer
As a result of the review process, on 26 October 2012 the Commission adopted a proposal for a new Directive that would amend the current Directive. The proposal is intended to lighten unnecessary administrative burdens and make it easier to assess potential impacts, without weakening existing environmental safeguards. The quality of the decision-making process will be reinforced, current levels of environmental protection will be improved, and businesses should enjoy a more harmonised regulatory framework. The changes are also forward looking, and emerging challenges that are important to the EU as a whole in areas like resource efficiency, climate change, biodiversity and disaster prevention will now be reflected in the assessment process.
Rationale
In July 2009, the Commission published a report on the application and effectiveness of the EIA Directive (COM(2009)378). The report outlines the strengths of the EIA Directive, highlights the main areas where improvements are needed and provides recommendations, where relevant.[1]
In June 2010, the Commission launched a wide public consultation. The consultation covers a broad variety of issues (e.g. quality of the EIA process, harmonisation of assessment requirements between Member States, assessment of transboundary projects or projects with transboundary effects, role of the environmental authorities, and development of synergies with other EU policies). More information on the public consultation can be found under the following webpage.
The phase of public consultation was concluded by a Conference for the 25th anniversary of the EIA Directive.
The findings of the public consultation and the conclusions of the Conference have fed into the Commission's review process of the EIA Directive.
See also
- op_fi:YVA
- op_fi:Manner-Suomen rakennerahasto-ohjelma
- Openness in participation, assessment, and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health: a review of literature and recent project results
- State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Environmental health
- heande:Assessment of impacts to environment and health in influencing manufacturing and public policy (suojattu, julkaisematon käsikirjoitus)
Keywords
References
Related files
<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>
