Difference between revisions of "Guidance links"

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Possible values for acceptance: * accepted (the guidance presented here is accepted in the useproject as such) * modified (the guidance presented here is accepted in the useproje...")
 
(explanation written in full)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:Opasnet]]
 +
{{method|moderator=Jouni|stub=Yes}}
 +
'''Guidance links''' are a method to show to which extent the guidance page you are reading is accepted in another guidance document. The abbreviation of the other guidance document is shown as a link. The structure of a guidance link is the following:
 +
 +
:(<font color="green">█</font> [[Benefit-risk assessment of food supplements|PFS]] | [[Benefit-risk assessment of food supplements/Guidance used|in PFS]] | '''What's this?''')
 +
 +
:* where the coloured box shows the level of acceptance,
 +
:* the ''PFS'' is a link to a guidance document about plant-based food supplements (PFS),
 +
:* the ''in PFS'' shows a summary table of different guidances that are used in PFS, and
 +
:* ''What's this?'' brings you to this page.
 +
 
Possible values for acceptance:
 
Possible values for acceptance:
* accepted (the guidance presented here is accepted in the useproject as such)
+
* <font color="green">█ accepted</font> (the guidance presented here is accepted in the other guidance document as such)
* modified (the guidance presented here is accepted in the useproject with modifications)
+
* <font color="yellow">█</font> modified (the guidance presented here is accepted in the other guidance document with modifications)
* rejected (the guidance presented here is not accepted in the useproject)
+
* <font color="red">█ rejected</font> (the guidance presented here is not accepted in the other guidance document)
* missing (the guidance presented here is not found in the useproject although you would expect it)
+
* <font color="grey">█ missing</font> (the guidance presented here is not found in the other guidance document although you would expect it).
 +
 
 +
==Keywords==
 +
 
 +
Cross-referencing, guidance, guidance document, acceptance, evaluation
 +
 
 +
==See also==
 +
 
 +
* [[Benefit-risk assessment of food supplements]]

Latest revision as of 11:43, 13 July 2011


Guidance links are a method to show to which extent the guidance page you are reading is accepted in another guidance document. The abbreviation of the other guidance document is shown as a link. The structure of a guidance link is the following:

( PFS | in PFS | What's this?)
  • where the coloured box shows the level of acceptance,
  • the PFS is a link to a guidance document about plant-based food supplements (PFS),
  • the in PFS shows a summary table of different guidances that are used in PFS, and
  • What's this? brings you to this page.

Possible values for acceptance:

  • █ accepted (the guidance presented here is accepted in the other guidance document as such)
  • modified (the guidance presented here is accepted in the other guidance document with modifications)
  • █ rejected (the guidance presented here is not accepted in the other guidance document)
  • █ missing (the guidance presented here is not found in the other guidance document although you would expect it).

Keywords

Cross-referencing, guidance, guidance document, acceptance, evaluation

See also