Difference between revisions of "Health effects of Second-hand smoke in Europe"
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" | ||
| + | |+ TABLE 3-5. Summary of recent reviews of health effects of second hand smoke (Adapted from: Öberg et al. 2010). | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2" | '''Health endpoint''' | | rowspan="2" | '''Health endpoint''' | ||
| Line 75: | Line 76: | ||
| n | | n | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | <small>* = The evidence of causality is concluded to be “inconclusive”, “little”, “unclear” or “inadequate”. <br> ** = The evidence of causality is concluded to be “suggestive”, “some” or “may contribute”. <br> *** = The evidence of causality is concluded to be “sufficient” or “supportive”. <br> n = Not evaluated in the report. </small> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === Exposure data === | ||
| + | Exposures to SHS and background risks vary by gender. Therefore, the data collection should account for differences in the exposures by gender. Some health effects are specific for children, so exposure data also had to be collected separately for children. Overall, the following exposure data are required for estimating the health impacts from SHS: | ||
| + | # Percentage of children exposed to SHS (i.e. regularly exposed), OR percentage of children having at least one smoking parent | ||
| + | # Percentage of non-smoking men exposed to SHS | ||
| + | # Percentage of non-smoking women exposed to SHS | ||
| + | |||
| + | For exposure data collection, we used data from national and international surveys as for example the Survey on Tobacco by the Gallup Organization for the European Commission (EC, 2009) or the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (Janson et al. 2006). The fieldwork for this study was conducted in December 2008 and over 26,500 randomly-selected citizens aged 15 years and over were interviewed in the 27 EU Member States and in Norway. The exposures for the six countries included in EBoDE | ||
| + | are presented in Table 3-6. The “upper estimate” is used as the most realistic estimate, as this exposure description matches best the exposure definition used in epidemiological studies from which we derived our exposure-response functions. The lower estimates are provided in Table 3-6 for future sensitivity analysis. Table 3-21 in section 3.12 provides a summary of these data. | ||
Revision as of 06:56, 7 June 2011
This page is a study.
The page identifier is Op_en5204 |
|---|
| Moderator:Mori (see all) |
| This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page, and then a rating bar will appear here. |
| Upload data
|
Contents
Second-hand smoke
About second-hand smoke
Second-hand smoke (SHS; also called environmental tobacco smoke or passive smoking) is a known human carcinogen (IARC, 2004). Exposure to SHS has been shown to cause lung cancer, IHD (ischemic heart disease) sudden infant death syndrome, asthma, lower respiratory infections in young children, low birth weight, reduced pulmonary function among children, acute otitis media, and acute irritant symptoms (WHO, 1999; Californian EPA 2005; US Surgeon General 2006; IARC 2004, Jaakkola et al. 2003). Most evidence for SHS-related impacts is fairly consistent.
SHS has been selected in our study because of its high public health impact, public concern and political interest. Policy measures to (further) reduce SHS exposure have been implemented in the recent past (e.g. the smoking ban) and further policy actions may be taken in the future.
Selected health endpoints and exposure-response functions
Out of the large number of health endpoints that SHS is associated with, we selected mortality and morbidity due to lung cancer and ischemic heart disease (IHD), morbidity due to onset of asthma (both in children and in adults), lower respiratory infections and acute otitis media. For the other health endpoints mentioned above, strong evidence is available, but the necessary disease statistics were lacking.
For the SHS-related burden of disease calculations, we have followed the recent WHO methods on the global estimation of disease burden from SHS (Öberg et al. 2010). A summary of outcomes with their respective evidence levels is provided in Table 3-5. The exposure response functions are presented in Table 3-19.
The selected exposure-response values are not gender-specific (e.g. exposure to male or female smoking spouse; exposure to paternal or maternal smoking). Instead, we used the mean relative risk for exposure to adults’ smoking. This choice was made in order to limit the sensitivity to gender-specific changes in smoking habits over time and across countries, and because not all exposure data were provided separately for men and women.
The selected outcomes are being applied only to non-smokers, i.e. to the non-smoking disease burden. To that effect, the disease burden due to active smoking has been deduced from the total disease burden, by country (based on total disease burden and active smoking disease burden by country provided by WHO; update 2002 based on Ezzati et al. (2004)).
| Health endpoint | Description | Conclusion regarding the level of evidence (in 3 reports) | ||
| WHO (1999) | Californian EPA (2005) | U.S. Surgeon General (2006) | ||
| Outcomes in children | ||||
| Acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) | Incidence of acute lower respiratory illnesses and hospitalizations | *** | *** | *** |
| Otitis media (middle ear infection) | Incidence of otitis media | *** | *** | *** |
| Asthma onset | Incidence of new cases | n | *** | ** |
| Outcomes in adults | ||||
| Asthma induction | Adult-onset incident asthma | *** | ** | n |
| Lung cancer | Incidence | *** | *** | *** |
| Ischemic heart disease (IHD) | Incidence of any ischemic heart disease | *** | *** | n |
* = The evidence of causality is concluded to be “inconclusive”, “little”, “unclear” or “inadequate”.
** = The evidence of causality is concluded to be “suggestive”, “some” or “may contribute”.
*** = The evidence of causality is concluded to be “sufficient” or “supportive”.
n = Not evaluated in the report.
Exposure data
Exposures to SHS and background risks vary by gender. Therefore, the data collection should account for differences in the exposures by gender. Some health effects are specific for children, so exposure data also had to be collected separately for children. Overall, the following exposure data are required for estimating the health impacts from SHS:
- Percentage of children exposed to SHS (i.e. regularly exposed), OR percentage of children having at least one smoking parent
- Percentage of non-smoking men exposed to SHS
- Percentage of non-smoking women exposed to SHS
For exposure data collection, we used data from national and international surveys as for example the Survey on Tobacco by the Gallup Organization for the European Commission (EC, 2009) or the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (Janson et al. 2006). The fieldwork for this study was conducted in December 2008 and over 26,500 randomly-selected citizens aged 15 years and over were interviewed in the 27 EU Member States and in Norway. The exposures for the six countries included in EBoDE are presented in Table 3-6. The “upper estimate” is used as the most realistic estimate, as this exposure description matches best the exposure definition used in epidemiological studies from which we derived our exposure-response functions. The lower estimates are provided in Table 3-6 for future sensitivity analysis. Table 3-21 in section 3.12 provides a summary of these data.
