Difference between revisions of "RM analysis Kati Iso-Markku"
From Testiwiki
(Created page with "{{encyclopedia|moderator=Kati Iso-Markku|stub=Yes}}") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{encyclopedia|moderator=Kati Iso-Markku|stub=Yes}} | {{encyclopedia|moderator=Kati Iso-Markku|stub=Yes}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==1.Brief description of risk management in the swine flu case== | ||
| + | *risks? | ||
| + | *benefits? | ||
| + | *decisions and decision makers? | ||
| + | *other roles? | ||
| + | *outcomes? | ||
| + | *subjective evaluation - strengths and weaknesses? | ||
| + | ==2.Alternative to risk management in the swine flu case== | ||
| + | *choose a particular decision (situation) | ||
| + | *describe the decision (situation) | ||
| + | *consider the possible outcomes it relates to | ||
| + | *consider possible decision options in the situation | ||
| + | *compare above to what actually happened | ||
| + | *consider how an alternative arrangement in that situation could have been different (e.g. better or worse) to what actually happened | ||
| + | *discuss the potential impacts and feasibility of implementing such alternative arrangements | ||
| + | ==3.Based on above, formulate a recommendation to the Ministry for future guidelines in major public health RM situations== | ||
Revision as of 09:13, 4 March 2011
This page is a encyclopedia article.
The page identifier is Op_en4974 |
|---|
| Moderator:Kati Iso-Markku (see all) |
| This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page, and then a rating bar will appear here. |
| Upload data
|
1.Brief description of risk management in the swine flu case
- risks?
- benefits?
- decisions and decision makers?
- other roles?
- outcomes?
- subjective evaluation - strengths and weaknesses?
2.Alternative to risk management in the swine flu case
- choose a particular decision (situation)
- describe the decision (situation)
- consider the possible outcomes it relates to
- consider possible decision options in the situation
- compare above to what actually happened
- consider how an alternative arrangement in that situation could have been different (e.g. better or worse) to what actually happened
- discuss the potential impacts and feasibility of implementing such alternative arrangements
