Search results

Create the page "Users" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• Defining the users of an assessment
  '''Users and use purposes of the method''' A spectrum of different potential users of the new risk assessment method can be described e.g. as:
  3 KB (405 words) - 13:17, 3 August 2008
• Intended users
  27 bytes (3 words) - 23:24, 6 June 2008

Page text matches

• From risk assessment to decisions in the EU and the US
  #Downstream users are brought into the system. ...ses which are made known to the manufacturer or importer by his downstream users and which the manufacturer or importer includes in his assessment.
  28 KB (4,037 words) - 11:12, 20 August 2014
• Testiwiki:Privacy policy
  ...the wiki servers and can be seen by Opasnet's server administrators and by users who have been granted "CheckUser" access. Your IP address, and its connecti ...re using a public machine and don't wish to expose your username to future users of the machine. (If so, clear the browser cache as well.)
  10 KB (1,647 words) - 08:02, 13 February 2012
• Testiwiki:General disclaimer
  ...on the part of [[THL]] or any of its agents, members, organizers or other users.
  3 KB (435 words) - 16:53, 9 May 2011
• Welcome to Opasnet
  ...ed is a learning process between assessors and the audience, the practical users of the information. This was not a unique idea, as the need had been identi ..., we had a continuous lack of participation even in projects where the key users of the assessment were involved. The problem was partly about tools that we
  17 KB (2,781 words) - 10:47, 27 August 2014
• Value judgement tool
  ...estion about how to organise issues so that feedback is collected from the users.
  8 KB (1,463 words) - 11:56, 7 February 2008
• PUrE
  ...models and tools, linked to a variety of GIS enabled datasets, to help end-users to conduct assessments, ranging from simple screening studies, to detailed
  2 KB (288 words) - 08:16, 18 June 2009
• Catastrophic non-linear impacts of climate change
  ===Intended users===
  3 KB (434 words) - 11:06, 13 March 2009
• Benefit-risk assessment of fish consumption for Beneris
  === Intended users ===
  12 KB (1,657 words) - 09:41, 29 January 2011
• Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland
  |+ '''Fish consumption among fish users according to Tero Hirvonen, 2007 (g/d). ...own into three steps. In the first step fish intake distributions for fish users were determined based on data in <ref name="Tero" />. Here, for a given spe
  6 KB (650 words) - 09:23, 3 January 2012
• Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland
  |+ '''Fish consumption in the subpopulation of fish users (g/d). ...sh species among all individuals in a certain sex/age group (users and non-users). The resulting distributions were further grouped and combined (first by a
  8 KB (1,178 words) - 09:32, 3 January 2012
• Risks and benefits related to consumption of vegetables
  ===Intended users===
  2 KB (322 words) - 11:18, 13 March 2009
• Henvinet (project)
  ...ion in collaboration with main stakeholders, with emphasis on the needs of users of information, more than of those producing it. To allow for efficient dat
  4 KB (520 words) - 19:08, 22 November 2009
• Help:Heande structure
  #* Description and management of Heande users: Located in the User namespace
  2 KB (323 words) - 22:21, 18 December 2007
• Benefit-risk assessment on farmed salmon
  ===Intended users=== * The primary users are public health authorities and decision-makers involved in giving food r
  8 KB (1,016 words) - 11:32, 13 March 2015
• Testiwiki:Structure of project contents
  ...hat describes the content and usage of the folder. Except for projects and users, all folders are further divided by year (four digits as the name of the su *users (a personal folder for users; should only be used for doctoral studies or similar personal content)
  5 KB (832 words) - 07:16, 4 November 2009
• Guidebook
  ::::[[Defining the users of an assessment]]
  19 KB (2,420 words) - 11:41, 24 October 2008
• Applying general information
  During this phase the users collect all readily available parts belonging to the scope of the assessmen
  2 KB (264 words) - 13:01, 3 August 2008
• Designing variables
  ...tors are the variables of most interest from the point of view of the use, users and other audiences of the assessment. The idea thus behind the indicator s
  7 KB (1,157 words) - 08:57, 2 December 2008
• Drawing a causal diagram
  **Indicators, i.e. the variables of most interest to the users of the outputs ...esting variables within the assessment scope from the point of view of the users and other audiences of the assessment output and what decision options are
  3 KB (485 words) - 13:19, 9 December 2008
• Issue framing tool
  ...ve functionalities for issue framing: defining a) the purpose, b) expected users, c) main questions, and d) boundaries of the assessment. Technically this i
  7 KB (1,042 words) - 13:15, 3 August 2008
• Reporting an assessment
  ...rmation created in the assessment is compiled and conveyed to the intended users. *Communication with users & stakeholders
  1 KB (129 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Reporting tool
  # Scope: Purpose, Boundaries, Scenarios, Optimizing, Analyses, Intended users, Participants (min required, max allowed)
  2 KB (207 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Scoping an assessment
  *The users, uses and possible other interested audiences of the assessment outputs *Collection of information and views through consultation of intended users and other stakeholders
  1 KB (193 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Defining the users of an assessment
  '''Users and use purposes of the method''' A spectrum of different potential users of the new risk assessment method can be described e.g. as:
  3 KB (405 words) - 13:17, 3 August 2008
• Contribution tool
  '''Contribution tool''' enables the users to provide contributions that maintain their content unchanged in time. The
  6 KB (947 words) - 11:42, 24 October 2008
• Gasbus - health impacts of Helsinki bus traffic
  ===Intended users===
  4 KB (525 words) - 20:56, 17 February 2010
• Collaborative workspace
  ...open groups to participate in risk assessments. It is an interface for the users to access the toolbox contents, make their contributions to the assessment ...ture of the content. Furthermore, the collaborative workspace provides the users access to the tools that they can use for making their contributions. Basic
  3 KB (418 words) - 13:15, 3 October 2008
• Assessment
  ! Intended use and users
  6 KB (985 words) - 07:58, 5 March 2015
• Evaluating assessment performance
  ** availability - observed access to assessment information by intended users ** acceptability of premises - (assumed) acceptance of premises by intended users, or others interested, or affected
  9 KB (1,312 words) - 12:02, 26 March 2009
• General assessment processes
  ...anipulation, and synthesis sub-processes among assessment participants and users ...ticular interest, and assessment-specific analyses are communicated to the users of the outputs. The results are discussed and conclusions are made about th
  20 KB (2,854 words) - 15:47, 29 January 2011
• Participating in assessments
  ...ractices still remain in the form of closed processes, where contacts with users are reduced to minimum, collaboration within the community of experts is ra ...and decision making processes; assessors themselves and decision makers as users of the assessments. The prevailing assessment tradition is that assessments
  38 KB (5,608 words) - 18:17, 8 April 2011
• Quality assurance and quality control
  model developers and users: (a) subject their model to credible, objective peer review; (b) assess * If users want to edit pages, they must register and give their real name either in t
  8 KB (1,253 words) - 14:56, 4 November 2009
• Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish
  === Intended users ===
  6 KB (855 words) - 11:22, 14 April 2011
• Heande
  ...ile the participation and usage of information in [[Opasnet]] is free, the users of [[Heande]] must accept its basic rule: the usage of information ''within The users of [[Heande]] must accept one basic rule:
  7 KB (1,113 words) - 09:46, 17 November 2009
• Evaluating performance of environmental health assessments
  ...luence on their use as well as making. On the one hand, evaluation informs users e.g. regarding the possible and appropriate uses of models and assessment o ...sessors should not end in completion of the output. On the other hand, the users of the outputs should not expect realization of the outcomes without having
  63 KB (8,880 words) - 16:20, 4 March 2015
• Monte Carlo Risk Assessment, July 2007
  MCRA is intended for users who want to analyze their own consumption and chemical concentration data.
  5 KB (702 words) - 11:28, 20 August 2014
• Cost-benefit analysis on composite traffic in the Helsinki Metropolitan area
  === Intended users===
  2 KB (291 words) - 07:07, 23 March 2010
• Testiwiki:Restructuring pyrkilo websites
  ...net.org'''. In addition, we will use opasnet.fi and opasnet.eu to redirect users to the actual site. The different wikis such as heande and tyjak will be mo ...e easy, and the structure of the system guides both the developers and the users.
  7 KB (1,191 words) - 07:16, 4 November 2009
• Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL)
  === Intended users ===
  23 KB (3,077 words) - 07:19, 30 January 2011
• Question
  ...it contains the research question but also participants, intended use and users, boundaries, and scenarios. For details, see [[assessment]].
  1 KB (166 words) - 04:18, 4 January 2013
• Participant
  ...[[attribute|subattribute]] of the [[assessment]]. See also [[Defining the users of an assessment]].<section end=glossary />
  687 bytes (94 words) - 07:10, 6 June 2008
• Risk assessment of nitrate in drinking water
  === Intended users ===
  10 KB (1,149 words) - 16:07, 29 January 2011
• Pyrkilo
  ...ting]]''' the assessment: Communicating the results and conclusions to the users. ...open groups to participate in risk assessments. It is an interface for the users to access the system contents, make their contributions to the assessment a
  65 KB (9,370 words) - 11:37, 20 November 2009
• Performance
  ==Performance evaluation by users== Users are the ultimate evaluators of an object. To facilitate this, it is useful
  4 KB (617 words) - 06:30, 15 November 2009
• BIOHER assessment
  === Intended users ===
  8 KB (1,053 words) - 11:36, 13 March 2015
• Assessment on Institute of Public Health and Welfare
  ===Intended users===
  7 KB (1,008 words) - 17:12, 30 September 2009
• Open assessment in research
  ...net organises and interprets information that is useful for the individual users (i.e., you!).
  12 KB (1,838 words) - 10:32, 22 July 2009
• Opasnet
  | Same, but we insist the modifiers to register as users. Additionally some of the pages have been protected so that only the draft
  18 KB (2,736 words) - 10:48, 27 August 2014
• Open assessment on the location of burden of greenhouse gas trade
  ===Intended users===
  7 KB (1,153 words) - 10:42, 19 September 2008
• Help:Analytica conventions in open assessment
  * The window size for modules should be as small as possible. Users may want to keep several windows open.
  7 KB (1,182 words) - 12:08, 6 April 2011
• Open assessment on loan market monitoring system
  ===Indended users===
  6 KB (1,068 words) - 15:37, 21 September 2008
• Systems science
  ...use of systems science methodologies in complex health problems. For other users, you may find information from the following links:
  16 KB (2,341 words) - 14:23, 19 March 2009
• Research on major environmental health issues and their abatement
  :;Users of the output (sidosryhmät/hyödyntäjät): Laitoksen terveysvaikutusarvio
  4 KB (504 words) - 22:31, 23 October 2008
• Open assessment on an emergency plan for North Korea
  ===Intended users===
  5 KB (737 words) - 21:21, 14 February 2010
• Release
  ...e. The 'Main' namespace is a special protection area in the sense that ALL users of [[Erac]] website have a read permission to the area. * Other users of [[Erac]] may freely and free of charge use contributions of others WITHI
  5 KB (761 words) - 14:29, 10 November 2008
• Cost-benefit assessment on composite traffic in Helsinki
  ===Indended users===
  5 KB (705 words) - 14:54, 7 April 2010
• Respect currency
  * [[Rating bar]] is used to collect feedback from users. Quality and usefulness can be asked separately. There should be a fixed ra
  12 KB (2,016 words) - 03:25, 2 April 2012
• Respect theory
  ...rst, the availability of information is restricted in some way so that the users are willing to pay for access to the information. Second, the information i
  37 KB (6,010 words) - 12:51, 4 January 2016
• Emission assessment of small-scale energy production in the Helsinki metropolitan area
  === Intented users ===
  10 KB (1,265 words) - 15:43, 29 January 2011
• Peer review
  ...cisions about which research to fund should be based on issues relevant to users of research. Next, John Ioannidis et al consider improvements in the approp ** [https://www.phas.ubc.ca/users/jesse-brewer Jesse Brewer, the founder of o'Peer]
  8 KB (1,222 words) - 09:17, 14 June 2014
• Opastopia
  | 5 Will be very important for attracting users with sensitive information.
  15 KB (2,257 words) - 06:35, 13 April 2011
• Transition agent
  ...a society. The speed of the diffusion process is affected by how potential users perceive its * giving practical guidance about [[Opasnet]] to new users,
  4 KB (595 words) - 21:39, 23 January 2009
• Opasnet Journal
  ...eeds up the publishing process, gives the new information available to the users earlier, and is more fair in the competition about the first publisher of a
  5 KB (776 words) - 10:38, 19 May 2010
• WHO mortality data
  WHO asks users to cooperate in the provision of electronically transmitted data by adherin (b) Users wishing to publish a technical description or qualification of the data wil
  7 KB (1,070 words) - 11:59, 24 February 2011
• Assessments - science-based decision support
  * learn the roles of participants and intended users. &rarr; determination of assessment purpose, boundaries and intended users
  13 KB (1,957 words) - 14:12, 27 March 2009
• Assessment on relationship between trust and risks within inter-organizational relationships
  ===Intended users===
  959 bytes (106 words) - 12:51, 17 February 2009
• Open assessment
  ...r functionalities than the wiki, but because the wiki is the interface for users, [[Opasnet]] is often used as a synonym for the Opasnet wiki. Other major ...right corner of many [[Opasnet]] pages. '''[[Peer rating]]''' means that users are requested to evaluate the scientific quality and usefulness of that pag
  36 KB (5,339 words) - 09:03, 15 September 2015
• Open Task Group on Climate Change
  ===Intended users===
  6 KB (975 words) - 06:27, 21 December 2009
• CLAIH assessment
  === Intended users ===
  24 KB (3,290 words) - 11:32, 13 March 2015
• Poll
  :'''Poll''' in [[Opasnet]] is a way to get feedback from users. Some pages have user polls about specific issues, and you can simply click
  550 bytes (83 words) - 20:30, 10 April 2015
• Beneris
  ...n different parts of Europe, and with ongoing or proposed EU projects. End-users and authorities will be involved from the beginning thus improving the scie
  6 KB (885 words) - 08:29, 19 March 2011
• Dissemination plan for benefit-risk assessment of food
  * be maintained, updated, and kept available to the users for several years after the original projects, ...y situations outside the food sector, thus increasing the critical mass of users and developers,
  16 KB (2,521 words) - 12:36, 27 July 2009
• Variable structure
  ...s includes a question from the viewpoint of the user, such that serves the users purposes.
  6 KB (825 words) - 09:48, 7 June 2012
• Assessment structure
  * [[Glossary#Intended user|Intended users]] * '''Intended users''' are those for whom the assessment is made.
  5 KB (600 words) - 10:01, 30 May 2012
• Car kilometres driven in the Helsinki metropolitan area
  * No-change fraction (fraction of composite traffic users who refuse to change during the trip)
  2 KB (216 words) - 20:15, 13 April 2011
• Common Case Study
  ===Intended users===
  5 KB (689 words) - 21:13, 22 March 2011
• Opasnet brochure
  ...these "meta-level" functionalities are rating bars on many Opasnet pages. Users can evaluate the scientific quality and usefulness of that page. This infor ...ment. Task functionality keeps task lists and sends email notifications to users to whom tasks are assigned by others.
  9 KB (1,317 words) - 13:25, 17 January 2011
• Frequently asked questions about Opasnet
  ...ietal decision-making. This is still its main purpose. Most of the current users are developing and utilising assessments about policy-relevant topics relat ...the data will need to transform it for their purposes. Data providers and users working in [[Opasnet]] have the common interest to minimise the work of tra
  14 KB (2,253 words) - 10:56, 25 June 2009
• Natural hazards and Opasnet
  * is more readily available to users, * is available to a larger group of users,
  4 KB (558 words) - 10:36, 13 June 2009
• E3MG
  * Energy users (21)
  10 KB (1,390 words) - 10:15, 16 October 2009
• WARM
  ...ants is calculated: SOx, NOx, PMs, CO, and volatile organic compounds. The users of fuels are the electricity, energy, agricultural and manufacturing firms,
  8 KB (1,072 words) - 10:11, 16 October 2009
• TREMOVE
  * The `transport demand module' describes the transport flows and the users' decision making process ...sures (i.e. total cost to society and costs by category: cost to transport users, transport producers, governments)
  11 KB (1,585 words) - 07:44, 30 June 2009
• TAXBEN
  ...esentative sample of around 25,000 British households. Thus, TAXBEN allows users to make accurate inferences about the aggregate revenue implications of spe
  4 KB (524 words) - 11:01, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating market processes
  * -Electricity prices (industrial users, households) * -Gas prices (industrial users, households)<ref name="eva"/>
  3 KB (478 words) - 10:56, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impacts on withdrawal of products
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (399 words) - 10:55, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impacts on differential treatment of businesses
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (506 words) - 10:51, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impacts on property rights
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (338 words) - 10:54, 16 October 2009
• Terms of Use
  ...d, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). Re-users can choose the license(s) they wish to comply with. Please note that these ==== Information for re-users ====
  6 KB (1,015 words) - 07:09, 2 July 2009
• Beneris project description
  *To develop methods to collect feedback from end-users about benefit-risk analyses. ...tive methods is planned as well as their availability over Internet to end-users.
  14 KB (2,069 words) - 09:24, 22 March 2010
• Beneris work packages
  *to develop methods to collect feedback from end-users about benefit-risk analyses;
  8 KB (1,201 words) - 09:22, 22 March 2010
• Opasnet slogans
  * Knowledge users of the world, unite! * Knowledge users of the world, unite!
  8 KB (1,354 words) - 06:32, 8 April 2015
• Evaluating impact on consumers' benefit from internationat market
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (275 words) - 10:45, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on consumer information and protection
  ...labels on packaging of goods, of technical documentation and of notices to users of goods and services. These may signal the degree of "civilisation" of a m
  2 KB (319 words) - 10:43, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on effects on certain sectors
  ...opa.eu/portal/page/portal/admin_pages/error Electricity prices (industrial users, households)] ...t.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/admin_pages/error Gas prices (industrial users, households)]
  4 KB (528 words) - 10:46, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on public authorities
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (421 words) - 10:48, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on investment and proper functioning
  -Electricity prices (industrial users, households) -Gas prices (industrial users, households)
  5 KB (768 words) - 10:46, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on natural desasters
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by [http://iato
  2 KB (297 words) - 11:06, 16 October 2009
• D37 Internet update, Beneris
  ...olls are a fast and convenient way of getting feedback or other input from users. Some Opasnet pages have user polls about specific issues, and you can simp :'''Poll''' in [[Opasnet]] is a way to get feedback from users. Some pages have user polls about specific issues, and you can simply click
  26 KB (4,188 words) - 13:13, 23 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on protection of young people at work
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (351 words) - 11:03, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on workers' existing rights and obligations
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (321 words) - 10:09, 24 July 2009

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)