Expert estimation in screening

From Testiwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project.

Expert estimation is a valuable (and often powerful) method for doing screening, in order to determine whether a full integrated impact assessment is appropriate. Its value comes, especially, from the fact that:

  • It can make use of a wide range of experience and knowledge, including unpublished evidence;
  • It is relatively quick and inexpensive to organise;
  • It is a formative as well as summative process – it provides insight into the assessment (e.g. in the form of comment from participants) and therefore can help to shape and plan the actual assessment.

In general terms, expert estimation involves surveying a group of people, with proven understanding of the topic, in order to derive some form of opinion about the likely importance and magnitude of the health impacts. There are many different ways of carrying out such surveys, including through the use of:

  • informal and formal meetings, including brainstorming and focus group meetings;
  • questionnaire or interview surveys;
  • internet-based collaboration (e.g. using Opasnet).

Further information on the use of Delphi surveys is provided via the link in the panel to the lfet, and a wide variety of methods are summarised on the Joint Research Centre's FOR-LEARN website. In each case, however, it is important to ensure that:

  • the participants have genuine expertise relevant to the issue of concern, preferably based on research experience;
  • the participants provide reasonably balanced coverage of the issue, and are not biased to particular aspects (e.g. exposure modelling, epidemiology, toxicology) or to particular schools of thought;
  • the consultation process requires justification of all opinions and statements (e.g. by reference to theory, observations or experiments);
  • the process provides opportunity for open feedback and comment;
  • the methods and results of the survey are open to scrutiny by stakeholders involved in the assessment.

Links to a detailed protocol on the design and organisation of expert elicitation methods, and a worked example on estimating exposure-response functions for ultrafines, are also given under See also.

See also

Integrated Environmental Health Impact Assessment System
IEHIAS is a website developed by two large EU-funded projects Intarese and Heimtsa. The content from the original website was moved to Opasnet.
Topic Pages

Boundaries · Population: age+sex 100m LAU2 Totals Age and gender · ExpoPlatform · Agriculture emissions · Climate · Soil: Degredation · Atlases: Geochemical Urban · SoDa · PVGIS · CORINE 2000 · Biomarkers: AP As BPA BFRs Cd Dioxins DBPs Fluorinated surfactants Pb Organochlorine insecticides OPs Parabens Phthalates PAHs PCBs · Health: Effects Statistics · CARE · IRTAD · Functions: Impact Exposure-response · Monetary values · Morbidity · Mortality: Database

Examples and case studies Defining question: Agriculture Waste Water · Defining stakeholders: Agriculture Waste Water · Engaging stakeholders: Water · Scenarios: Agriculture Crop CAP Crop allocation Energy crop · Scenario examples: Transport Waste SRES-population UVR and Cancer
Models and methods Ind. select · Mindmap · Diagr. tools · Scen. constr. · Focal sum · Land use · Visual. toolbox · SIENA: Simulator Data Description · Mass balance · Matrix · Princ. comp. · ADMS · CAR · CHIMERE · EcoSenseWeb · H2O Quality · EMF loss · Geomorf · UVR models · INDEX · RISK IAQ · CalTOX · PANGEA · dynamiCROP · IndusChemFate · Transport · PBPK Cd · PBTK dioxin · Exp. Response · Impact calc. · Aguila · Protocol elic. · Info value · DST metadata · E & H: Monitoring Frameworks · Integrated monitoring: Concepts Framework Methods Needs
Listings Health impacts of agricultural land use change · Health impacts of regulative policies on use of DBP in consumer products
Guidance System
The concept
Issue framing Formulating scenarios · Scenarios: Prescriptive Descriptive Predictive Probabilistic · Scoping · Building a conceptual model · Causal chain · Other frameworks · Selecting indicators
Design Learning · Accuracy · Complex exposures · Matching exposure and health · Info needs · Vulnerable groups · Values · Variation · Location · Resolution · Zone design · Timeframes · Justice · Screening · Estimation · Elicitation · Delphi · Extrapolation · Transferring results · Temporal extrapolation · Spatial extrapolation · Triangulation · Rapid modelling · Intake fraction · iF reading · Piloting · Example · Piloting data · Protocol development
Execution Causal chain · Contaminant sources · Disaggregation · Contaminant release · Transport and fate · Source attribution · Multimedia models · Exposure · Exposure modelling · Intake fraction · Exposure-to-intake · Internal dose · Exposure-response · Impact analysis · Monetisation · Monetary values · Uncertainty