Search results

Create the page "Users" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• Defining the users of an assessment
  '''Users and use purposes of the method''' A spectrum of different potential users of the new risk assessment method can be described e.g. as:
  3 KB (405 words) - 13:17, 3 August 2008
• Intended users
  27 bytes (3 words) - 23:24, 6 June 2008

Page text matches

• From risk assessment to decisions in the EU and the US
  #Downstream users are brought into the system. ...ses which are made known to the manufacturer or importer by his downstream users and which the manufacturer or importer includes in his assessment.
  28 KB (4,037 words) - 11:12, 20 August 2014
• Testiwiki:Privacy policy
  ...the wiki servers and can be seen by Opasnet's server administrators and by users who have been granted "CheckUser" access. Your IP address, and its connecti ...re using a public machine and don't wish to expose your username to future users of the machine. (If so, clear the browser cache as well.)
  10 KB (1,647 words) - 08:02, 13 February 2012
• Testiwiki:General disclaimer
  ...on the part of [[THL]] or any of its agents, members, organizers or other users.
  3 KB (435 words) - 16:53, 9 May 2011
• Welcome to Opasnet
  ...ed is a learning process between assessors and the audience, the practical users of the information. This was not a unique idea, as the need had been identi ..., we had a continuous lack of participation even in projects where the key users of the assessment were involved. The problem was partly about tools that we
  17 KB (2,781 words) - 10:47, 27 August 2014
• Value judgement tool
  ...estion about how to organise issues so that feedback is collected from the users.
  8 KB (1,463 words) - 11:56, 7 February 2008
• PUrE
  ...models and tools, linked to a variety of GIS enabled datasets, to help end-users to conduct assessments, ranging from simple screening studies, to detailed
  2 KB (288 words) - 08:16, 18 June 2009
• Catastrophic non-linear impacts of climate change
  ===Intended users===
  3 KB (434 words) - 11:06, 13 March 2009
• Benefit-risk assessment of fish consumption for Beneris
  === Intended users ===
  12 KB (1,657 words) - 09:41, 29 January 2011
• Domestic fish consumption of the pregnant women in Finland
  |+ '''Fish consumption among fish users according to Tero Hirvonen, 2007 (g/d). ...own into three steps. In the first step fish intake distributions for fish users were determined based on data in <ref name="Tero" />. Here, for a given spe
  6 KB (650 words) - 09:23, 3 January 2012
• Domestic fish consumption of the general population in Finland
  |+ '''Fish consumption in the subpopulation of fish users (g/d). ...sh species among all individuals in a certain sex/age group (users and non-users). The resulting distributions were further grouped and combined (first by a
  8 KB (1,178 words) - 09:32, 3 January 2012
• Risks and benefits related to consumption of vegetables
  ===Intended users===
  2 KB (322 words) - 11:18, 13 March 2009
• Henvinet (project)
  ...ion in collaboration with main stakeholders, with emphasis on the needs of users of information, more than of those producing it. To allow for efficient dat
  4 KB (520 words) - 19:08, 22 November 2009
• Help:Heande structure
  #* Description and management of Heande users: Located in the User namespace
  2 KB (323 words) - 22:21, 18 December 2007
• Benefit-risk assessment on farmed salmon
  ===Intended users=== * The primary users are public health authorities and decision-makers involved in giving food r
  8 KB (1,016 words) - 11:32, 13 March 2015
• Testiwiki:Structure of project contents
  ...hat describes the content and usage of the folder. Except for projects and users, all folders are further divided by year (four digits as the name of the su *users (a personal folder for users; should only be used for doctoral studies or similar personal content)
  5 KB (832 words) - 07:16, 4 November 2009
• Guidebook
  ::::[[Defining the users of an assessment]]
  19 KB (2,420 words) - 11:41, 24 October 2008
• Applying general information
  During this phase the users collect all readily available parts belonging to the scope of the assessmen
  2 KB (264 words) - 13:01, 3 August 2008
• Designing variables
  ...tors are the variables of most interest from the point of view of the use, users and other audiences of the assessment. The idea thus behind the indicator s
  7 KB (1,157 words) - 08:57, 2 December 2008
• Drawing a causal diagram
  **Indicators, i.e. the variables of most interest to the users of the outputs ...esting variables within the assessment scope from the point of view of the users and other audiences of the assessment output and what decision options are
  3 KB (485 words) - 13:19, 9 December 2008
• Issue framing tool
  ...ve functionalities for issue framing: defining a) the purpose, b) expected users, c) main questions, and d) boundaries of the assessment. Technically this i
  7 KB (1,042 words) - 13:15, 3 August 2008
• Reporting an assessment
  ...rmation created in the assessment is compiled and conveyed to the intended users. *Communication with users & stakeholders
  1 KB (129 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Reporting tool
  # Scope: Purpose, Boundaries, Scenarios, Optimizing, Analyses, Intended users, Participants (min required, max allowed)
  2 KB (207 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Scoping an assessment
  *The users, uses and possible other interested audiences of the assessment outputs *Collection of information and views through consultation of intended users and other stakeholders
  1 KB (193 words) - 13:16, 3 August 2008
• Defining the users of an assessment
  '''Users and use purposes of the method''' A spectrum of different potential users of the new risk assessment method can be described e.g. as:
  3 KB (405 words) - 13:17, 3 August 2008
• Contribution tool
  '''Contribution tool''' enables the users to provide contributions that maintain their content unchanged in time. The
  6 KB (947 words) - 11:42, 24 October 2008
• Gasbus - health impacts of Helsinki bus traffic
  ===Intended users===
  4 KB (525 words) - 20:56, 17 February 2010
• Collaborative workspace
  ...open groups to participate in risk assessments. It is an interface for the users to access the toolbox contents, make their contributions to the assessment ...ture of the content. Furthermore, the collaborative workspace provides the users access to the tools that they can use for making their contributions. Basic
  3 KB (418 words) - 13:15, 3 October 2008
• Assessment
  ! Intended use and users
  6 KB (985 words) - 07:58, 5 March 2015
• Evaluating assessment performance
  ** availability - observed access to assessment information by intended users ** acceptability of premises - (assumed) acceptance of premises by intended users, or others interested, or affected
  9 KB (1,312 words) - 12:02, 26 March 2009
• General assessment processes
  ...anipulation, and synthesis sub-processes among assessment participants and users ...ticular interest, and assessment-specific analyses are communicated to the users of the outputs. The results are discussed and conclusions are made about th
  20 KB (2,854 words) - 15:47, 29 January 2011
• Participating in assessments
  ...ractices still remain in the form of closed processes, where contacts with users are reduced to minimum, collaboration within the community of experts is ra ...and decision making processes; assessors themselves and decision makers as users of the assessments. The prevailing assessment tradition is that assessments
  38 KB (5,608 words) - 18:17, 8 April 2011
• Quality assurance and quality control
  model developers and users: (a) subject their model to credible, objective peer review; (b) assess * If users want to edit pages, they must register and give their real name either in t
  8 KB (1,253 words) - 14:56, 4 November 2009
• Benefit-risk assessment of methyl mercury and omega-3 fatty acids in fish
  === Intended users ===
  6 KB (855 words) - 11:22, 14 April 2011
• Heande
  ...ile the participation and usage of information in [[Opasnet]] is free, the users of [[Heande]] must accept its basic rule: the usage of information ''within The users of [[Heande]] must accept one basic rule:
  7 KB (1,113 words) - 09:46, 17 November 2009
• Evaluating performance of environmental health assessments
  ...luence on their use as well as making. On the one hand, evaluation informs users e.g. regarding the possible and appropriate uses of models and assessment o ...sessors should not end in completion of the output. On the other hand, the users of the outputs should not expect realization of the outcomes without having
  63 KB (8,880 words) - 16:20, 4 March 2015
• Monte Carlo Risk Assessment, July 2007
  MCRA is intended for users who want to analyze their own consumption and chemical concentration data.
  5 KB (702 words) - 11:28, 20 August 2014
• Cost-benefit analysis on composite traffic in the Helsinki Metropolitan area
  === Intended users===
  2 KB (291 words) - 07:07, 23 March 2010
• Testiwiki:Restructuring pyrkilo websites
  ...net.org'''. In addition, we will use opasnet.fi and opasnet.eu to redirect users to the actual site. The different wikis such as heande and tyjak will be mo ...e easy, and the structure of the system guides both the developers and the users.
  7 KB (1,191 words) - 07:16, 4 November 2009
• Assessment on impacts of emission trading on city-level (ET-CL)
  === Intended users ===
  23 KB (3,077 words) - 07:19, 30 January 2011
• Question
  ...it contains the research question but also participants, intended use and users, boundaries, and scenarios. For details, see [[assessment]].
  1 KB (166 words) - 04:18, 4 January 2013
• Participant
  ...[[attribute|subattribute]] of the [[assessment]]. See also [[Defining the users of an assessment]].<section end=glossary />
  687 bytes (94 words) - 07:10, 6 June 2008
• Risk assessment of nitrate in drinking water
  === Intended users ===
  10 KB (1,149 words) - 16:07, 29 January 2011
• Pyrkilo
  ...ting]]''' the assessment: Communicating the results and conclusions to the users. ...open groups to participate in risk assessments. It is an interface for the users to access the system contents, make their contributions to the assessment a
  65 KB (9,370 words) - 11:37, 20 November 2009
• Performance
  ==Performance evaluation by users== Users are the ultimate evaluators of an object. To facilitate this, it is useful
  4 KB (617 words) - 06:30, 15 November 2009
• BIOHER assessment
  === Intended users ===
  8 KB (1,053 words) - 11:36, 13 March 2015
• Assessment on Institute of Public Health and Welfare
  ===Intended users===
  7 KB (1,008 words) - 17:12, 30 September 2009
• Open assessment in research
  ...net organises and interprets information that is useful for the individual users (i.e., you!).
  12 KB (1,838 words) - 10:32, 22 July 2009
• Opasnet
  | Same, but we insist the modifiers to register as users. Additionally some of the pages have been protected so that only the draft
  18 KB (2,736 words) - 10:48, 27 August 2014
• Open assessment on the location of burden of greenhouse gas trade
  ===Intended users===
  7 KB (1,153 words) - 10:42, 19 September 2008
• Help:Analytica conventions in open assessment
  * The window size for modules should be as small as possible. Users may want to keep several windows open.
  7 KB (1,182 words) - 12:08, 6 April 2011
• Open assessment on loan market monitoring system
  ===Indended users===
  6 KB (1,068 words) - 15:37, 21 September 2008
• Systems science
  ...use of systems science methodologies in complex health problems. For other users, you may find information from the following links:
  16 KB (2,341 words) - 14:23, 19 March 2009
• Research on major environmental health issues and their abatement
  :;Users of the output (sidosryhmät/hyödyntäjät): Laitoksen terveysvaikutusarvio
  4 KB (504 words) - 22:31, 23 October 2008
• Open assessment on an emergency plan for North Korea
  ===Intended users===
  5 KB (737 words) - 21:21, 14 February 2010
• Release
  ...e. The 'Main' namespace is a special protection area in the sense that ALL users of [[Erac]] website have a read permission to the area. * Other users of [[Erac]] may freely and free of charge use contributions of others WITHI
  5 KB (761 words) - 14:29, 10 November 2008
• Cost-benefit assessment on composite traffic in Helsinki
  ===Indended users===
  5 KB (705 words) - 14:54, 7 April 2010
• Respect currency
  * [[Rating bar]] is used to collect feedback from users. Quality and usefulness can be asked separately. There should be a fixed ra
  12 KB (2,016 words) - 03:25, 2 April 2012
• Respect theory
  ...rst, the availability of information is restricted in some way so that the users are willing to pay for access to the information. Second, the information i
  37 KB (6,010 words) - 12:51, 4 January 2016
• Emission assessment of small-scale energy production in the Helsinki metropolitan area
  === Intented users ===
  10 KB (1,265 words) - 15:43, 29 January 2011
• Peer review
  ...cisions about which research to fund should be based on issues relevant to users of research. Next, John Ioannidis et al consider improvements in the approp ** [https://www.phas.ubc.ca/users/jesse-brewer Jesse Brewer, the founder of o'Peer]
  8 KB (1,222 words) - 09:17, 14 June 2014
• Opastopia
  | 5 Will be very important for attracting users with sensitive information.
  15 KB (2,257 words) - 06:35, 13 April 2011
• Transition agent
  ...a society. The speed of the diffusion process is affected by how potential users perceive its * giving practical guidance about [[Opasnet]] to new users,
  4 KB (595 words) - 21:39, 23 January 2009
• Opasnet Journal
  ...eeds up the publishing process, gives the new information available to the users earlier, and is more fair in the competition about the first publisher of a
  5 KB (776 words) - 10:38, 19 May 2010
• WHO mortality data
  WHO asks users to cooperate in the provision of electronically transmitted data by adherin (b) Users wishing to publish a technical description or qualification of the data wil
  7 KB (1,070 words) - 11:59, 24 February 2011
• Assessments - science-based decision support
  * learn the roles of participants and intended users. &rarr; determination of assessment purpose, boundaries and intended users
  13 KB (1,957 words) - 14:12, 27 March 2009
• Assessment on relationship between trust and risks within inter-organizational relationships
  ===Intended users===
  959 bytes (106 words) - 12:51, 17 February 2009
• Open assessment
  ...r functionalities than the wiki, but because the wiki is the interface for users, [[Opasnet]] is often used as a synonym for the Opasnet wiki. Other major ...right corner of many [[Opasnet]] pages. '''[[Peer rating]]''' means that users are requested to evaluate the scientific quality and usefulness of that pag
  36 KB (5,339 words) - 09:03, 15 September 2015
• Open Task Group on Climate Change
  ===Intended users===
  6 KB (975 words) - 06:27, 21 December 2009
• CLAIH assessment
  === Intended users ===
  24 KB (3,290 words) - 11:32, 13 March 2015
• Poll
  :'''Poll''' in [[Opasnet]] is a way to get feedback from users. Some pages have user polls about specific issues, and you can simply click
  550 bytes (83 words) - 20:30, 10 April 2015
• Beneris
  ...n different parts of Europe, and with ongoing or proposed EU projects. End-users and authorities will be involved from the beginning thus improving the scie
  6 KB (885 words) - 08:29, 19 March 2011
• Dissemination plan for benefit-risk assessment of food
  * be maintained, updated, and kept available to the users for several years after the original projects, ...y situations outside the food sector, thus increasing the critical mass of users and developers,
  16 KB (2,521 words) - 12:36, 27 July 2009
• Variable structure
  ...s includes a question from the viewpoint of the user, such that serves the users purposes.
  6 KB (825 words) - 09:48, 7 June 2012
• Assessment structure
  * [[Glossary#Intended user|Intended users]] * '''Intended users''' are those for whom the assessment is made.
  5 KB (600 words) - 10:01, 30 May 2012
• Car kilometres driven in the Helsinki metropolitan area
  * No-change fraction (fraction of composite traffic users who refuse to change during the trip)
  2 KB (216 words) - 20:15, 13 April 2011
• Common Case Study
  ===Intended users===
  5 KB (689 words) - 21:13, 22 March 2011
• Opasnet brochure
  ...these "meta-level" functionalities are rating bars on many Opasnet pages. Users can evaluate the scientific quality and usefulness of that page. This infor ...ment. Task functionality keeps task lists and sends email notifications to users to whom tasks are assigned by others.
  9 KB (1,317 words) - 13:25, 17 January 2011
• Frequently asked questions about Opasnet
  ...ietal decision-making. This is still its main purpose. Most of the current users are developing and utilising assessments about policy-relevant topics relat ...the data will need to transform it for their purposes. Data providers and users working in [[Opasnet]] have the common interest to minimise the work of tra
  14 KB (2,253 words) - 10:56, 25 June 2009
• Natural hazards and Opasnet
  * is more readily available to users, * is available to a larger group of users,
  4 KB (558 words) - 10:36, 13 June 2009
• E3MG
  * Energy users (21)
  10 KB (1,390 words) - 10:15, 16 October 2009
• WARM
  ...ants is calculated: SOx, NOx, PMs, CO, and volatile organic compounds. The users of fuels are the electricity, energy, agricultural and manufacturing firms,
  8 KB (1,072 words) - 10:11, 16 October 2009
• TREMOVE
  * The `transport demand module' describes the transport flows and the users' decision making process ...sures (i.e. total cost to society and costs by category: cost to transport users, transport producers, governments)
  11 KB (1,585 words) - 07:44, 30 June 2009
• TAXBEN
  ...esentative sample of around 25,000 British households. Thus, TAXBEN allows users to make accurate inferences about the aggregate revenue implications of spe
  4 KB (524 words) - 11:01, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating market processes
  * -Electricity prices (industrial users, households) * -Gas prices (industrial users, households)<ref name="eva"/>
  3 KB (478 words) - 10:56, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impacts on withdrawal of products
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (399 words) - 10:55, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impacts on differential treatment of businesses
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (506 words) - 10:51, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impacts on property rights
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (338 words) - 10:54, 16 October 2009
• Terms of Use
  ...d, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). Re-users can choose the license(s) they wish to comply with. Please note that these ==== Information for re-users ====
  6 KB (1,015 words) - 07:09, 2 July 2009
• Beneris project description
  *To develop methods to collect feedback from end-users about benefit-risk analyses. ...tive methods is planned as well as their availability over Internet to end-users.
  14 KB (2,069 words) - 09:24, 22 March 2010
• Beneris work packages
  *to develop methods to collect feedback from end-users about benefit-risk analyses;
  8 KB (1,201 words) - 09:22, 22 March 2010
• Opasnet slogans
  * Knowledge users of the world, unite! * Knowledge users of the world, unite!
  8 KB (1,354 words) - 06:32, 8 April 2015
• Evaluating impact on consumers' benefit from internationat market
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (275 words) - 10:45, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on consumer information and protection
  ...labels on packaging of goods, of technical documentation and of notices to users of goods and services. These may signal the degree of "civilisation" of a m
  2 KB (319 words) - 10:43, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on effects on certain sectors
  ...opa.eu/portal/page/portal/admin_pages/error Electricity prices (industrial users, households)] ...t.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/admin_pages/error Gas prices (industrial users, households)]
  4 KB (528 words) - 10:46, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on public authorities
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (421 words) - 10:48, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on investment and proper functioning
  -Electricity prices (industrial users, households) -Gas prices (industrial users, households)
  5 KB (768 words) - 10:46, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on natural desasters
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by [http://iato
  2 KB (297 words) - 11:06, 16 October 2009
• D37 Internet update, Beneris
  ...olls are a fast and convenient way of getting feedback or other input from users. Some Opasnet pages have user polls about specific issues, and you can simp :'''Poll''' in [[Opasnet]] is a way to get feedback from users. Some pages have user polls about specific issues, and you can simply click
  26 KB (4,188 words) - 13:13, 23 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on protection of young people at work
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (351 words) - 11:03, 16 October 2009
• Evaluating impact on workers' existing rights and obligations
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (321 words) - 10:09, 24 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on restructuring in the workplace
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (386 words) - 10:18, 24 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on option's ability to inform public
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (231 words) - 11:04, 24 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on entailing different treatment
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (449 words) - 11:44, 24 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on privacy of individuals
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (356 words) - 11:58, 24 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on family life
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  1 KB (228 words) - 12:02, 24 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on prosessing personal data
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (283 words) - 12:07, 24 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on actors' and stakeholders' treatment
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  3 KB (475 words) - 12:27, 24 July 2009
• Evaluating impact on autonomy of social partners
  ...blicly available databases that are directly related to this key question. Users are invited to contribute their own knowledge to this topic by contacting t
  2 KB (257 words) - 12:31, 24 July 2009
• Simupedia
  Simupedia is a web portal which invites its users to collaboratively find solutions to complex design and decision making pro
  961 bytes (125 words) - 13:17, 13 December 2014
• NextBio
  ...trials, and scientific news. In addition, NextBio Basic allows registered users to personalize their NextBio experience and communicate, collaborate, and s
  604 bytes (83 words) - 18:02, 8 October 2009
• Indoor particulate matter
  ...rs, namely wood and coal) to the incidence of the control group (here: non-users of coal and wood).
  14 KB (2,168 words) - 15:08, 7 April 2010
• Assessment on municipality funding crisis
  ===Intended users===
  4 KB (686 words) - 21:58, 24 October 2009
• Normal context of use
  ...use should be clearly described under the sub-attribute ''Intended use and users''; then, that context is used for guiding work and evaluating performance,
  1 KB (190 words) - 13:38, 13 November 2009
• Climate change policy assessment
  ===Intended users===
  12 KB (1,669 words) - 13:53, 23 September 2010
• Help:Practical guide on stakeholder involvement
  ...d-back on the risk assessment issues, process and outcomes ('''critics and users'''), for example, exposed local residents, experts, policy makers, journali
  40 KB (5,606 words) - 12:16, 6 April 2011
• Primarisk
  ...he system would not provide a predefined decision grid but rather help the users defining their own and, by this way, progressing in their definition of ris ...fourth stage involve the sharing of knowledge by the potential PRIMARISK® users: administration, plant operators, consulting firms. As a result, the essenc
  8 KB (1,200 words) - 10:51, 20 November 2009
• Kuopio workshop report
  ...ls of particular phases and steps of risk assessment as well as unites the users to work, e.g. contribute, communicate, document, report and manage, effecti
  18 KB (2,900 words) - 10:52, 20 November 2009
• Help:Encyclopedia on environmental health
  ...s, the contents of the encyclopedia may be of interest to a wider group of users, such as e.g. decision-makers, NGOs, industry or public at large. {{disclin
  1 KB (202 words) - 12:10, 6 April 2011
• Help:Integrated resource platform
  ...erest for their own risk assessments. In the Integrated resource platform, users can consult these data or tools (for example to check the coherence of thei
  2 KB (279 words) - 07:46, 25 March 2010
• Geography/GIS
  ...referenced information. In a more generic sense, GIS is a tool that allows users to create interactive queries (user created searches), analyze the spatial
  4 KB (545 words) - 10:53, 20 November 2009
• Help:Extended causal diagram
  ...rticularly important variable in relation to the interests of the intended users of the assessment output (i.e. it must be a means of effective communicatio
  7 KB (1,068 words) - 12:10, 6 April 2011
• Help:GIS tool
  ...referenced information. In a more generic sense, GIS is a tool that allows users to create interactive queries (user created searches), analyse the spatial Secondly, users might wish to carry-out analysis of geographically referenced data, for wh
  9 KB (1,390 words) - 12:10, 6 April 2011
• Guidance and methods for indicator selection and specification
  ...hat is particularly important in relation to the interests of the intended users of the assessment output or other stakeholders. Indicators are used as mean ..., especially from the point of view of addressing the purpose and targeted users or audiences of the assessments. Indicators can also be used as the ''backb
  62 KB (9,399 words) - 10:54, 20 November 2009
• Food and agriculture related climate and health impacts
  ===Intended users===
  3 KB (413 words) - 08:20, 30 November 2009
• Impacts of urban transport
  ===Intended use and users=== * [[Mega case study]] users
  3 KB (341 words) - 15:12, 30 November 2009
• Public health impacts of GHG emission reduction strategies in household energy use
  ===Intended users===
  5 KB (623 words) - 07:25, 19 March 2015
• Minimal publishable unit
  ...sions are archived and available, but they are rarely of interest to other users than scientific historians or people who are interested in who should get t
  2 KB (335 words) - 04:49, 6 March 2010
• Peer rating
  ...d to rank pages based on their scientific quality and usefulness. Then the users can compare their estimates to other people's estimates of other pages.
  4 KB (720 words) - 08:40, 4 August 2011
• Beneris deliverables
  ...action, an Internet survey was performed, and useful information from end users was obtained. Also, the technical capability to perform surveys in [[Opasne | To develop methods to collect feedback from end-users about benefit-risk analyses.
  34 KB (5,166 words) - 11:03, 14 July 2016
• Science 2.0
  ...t it with other data that might be relevant. Blogs, wikis and such, permit users to make information available in ways that create a conversation. [[:en:Web ...to try to do this by making your application look professional and secure. Users must have the right permissions, their own space and have to be defended ag
  14 KB (1,908 words) - 15:06, 20 April 2010
• Data protection in Opasnet
  ...information structure), and how are they solved to the satisfaction of the users?
  2 KB (291 words) - 14:14, 8 May 2010
• Professorship of respect research
  ...rmation is openly and immediately shared with other researchers, potential users, and basically everyone. In addition, the work is done by [[mass collaborat
  1 KB (167 words) - 05:16, 28 May 2010
• Benefit-risk assessment of food supplements
  ...sessment and what is the intended use? It is especially important that the users identified actually participate in the making of the assessment, not just r ...participate to identify and prevent any attempts to manipulate outcomes by users or any other group.
  19 KB (2,941 words) - 12:53, 15 August 2011
• Meta-database of biologically active compounds
  [[THL]], ICC and IFR will develop an Internet-based interface where users can access, combine, by
  2 KB (199 words) - 13:40, 6 June 2012
• Benefit-risk assessment of plant-based food supplements
  ===Intended use and users===
  6 KB (784 words) - 13:39, 6 June 2012
• Usability of Mediawiki as a collaborative workspace for knowledge creation
  * Questionnaire to OpasNet users ** Roles of OpasNet users (administrator, researcher, reader, ...)
  1 KB (212 words) - 08:09, 19 April 2011
• Are we starting to glow from the uranium in our environment?
  ...alth risk assessment. Some physiological changes have been detected in the users of tube wells in regions where there are uranium rich bedrocks. For example
  2 KB (325 words) - 13:33, 6 July 2010
• Should risk assessment be more transparent?
  ...studies would make them public through an official channel, and subsequent users of the data would need to buy a license from the original firm to use the d
  5 KB (871 words) - 14:31, 9 July 2010
• Are electric lines and transformers dangerous?
  ...high-voltage transmission lines long distances from power stations to end users. The voltages can range between 110 to 765 kV. The current produces a magne
  5 KB (780 words) - 14:21, 9 July 2010
• Principles of Characterizing and Applying Human Exposure Models
  ...haracterizing, evaluating and using exposure models in order to help model users select and apply the most appropriate models. The report also discusses iss
  1 KB (139 words) - 12:34, 22 June 2010
• CalTOX
  CalTOX has been designed to provide users with the options of: (1) making point estimates of average exposure during
  9 KB (1,359 words) - 14:13, 13 October 2014
• Exposure and Fate Assessment Screening Tool (E-FAST)
  ...also known as E-FAST V2.0, is a screening-level computer tool that allows users to estimate chemical concentrations in water to which aquatic life may be e
  1 KB (170 words) - 12:05, 2 March 2011
• ArcReader
  ArcReader is a free, easy-to-use desktop mapping application that allows users to view, explore, and print maps and globes. Anyone with ArcReader can view
  458 bytes (61 words) - 11:33, 22 June 2010
• Should we have antibiotic chemicals present in everyday domestic items?
  ...borrowing the necessary gene from another bacterium. Bacteria were skilful users of biotechnology much before man even invented the word. It is to be noted
  7 KB (1,032 words) - 09:31, 9 July 2010
• Should solariums carry a health warning?
  ...eds are used by young people. Presently about one out of every five sunbed users are between 20 and 24 years old, and a significant number are even younger. ...y countries, there are legislative limits for dose rates. In addition, the users must be given accurate advice on how to regulate the dose in the solarium.
  4 KB (609 words) - 09:50, 9 July 2010
• Can the air go up in flames?
  ...sources may lead to high concentrations. This should be appreciated by the users of gas heaters and stoves especially if they are used in a relatively small
  4 KB (690 words) - 10:01, 9 July 2010
• Hearing impairment
  ...were affected. A survey among 1,000 respondents, including 100 hearing aid users, aged 18 - 65yrs, found that 40 % of the population of Valencia experience ...s <br/>7.7% est to benefit from hearing aid <br/>Prevalence of hearing-aid users, 2.4% <br/>Reported tinnitus, 13.2% <br/>M4 BE≥25 dB HL, 16.9% <br/>M4 BE
  3 KB (434 words) - 11:07, 1 July 2010
• Todo
  To view the tasks of other users, simply go to Special:TaskList/username
  1 KB (181 words) - 07:57, 13 July 2011
• Why are people afraid of dental amalgam?
  ...tal amalgams and alternative dental restoration materials for patients and users. Their conclusion was that dental amalgam fillings occasionally cause local
  5 KB (761 words) - 13:10, 9 July 2010
• Uploading to Opasnet Base
  ...uploading data in CSV or XLS files to the Opasnet Base. Registered Opasnet users can use this tool by following the "Upload data" link in the top right corn # '''If you want to collect data from several Opasnet users''': Interface for R code can also be extended to upload data from a questio
  8 KB (1,240 words) - 17:52, 6 May 2015
• MindTrek2010
  # '''Users:''' Potential users that will benefit from the Energy Policy Assessment, as well as Opasnet in ...y following the links at the top of each Opasnet page. After registration, users can use the functionalities of the wiki-menu on the left hand side of the p
  5 KB (719 words) - 14:03, 27 August 2010
• AcaWiki
  [http://acawiki.org/Home AcaWiki] is a wiki which allows users to share summaries and literature reviews of peer-reviewed academic researc
  243 bytes (35 words) - 12:25, 31 August 2010
• SMWCon
  ...s on Semantic Mediawiki tools, extension and applications. It is aimed for users, developers and enthusiasts of Semantic MediaWiki from the corporate, acade
  504 bytes (64 words) - 12:51, 8 September 2010
• Urgenche
  ...also be breathing in harmful fumes and be at greater risk from other road users. All of these things have to be considered in context to the city in questi
  10 KB (1,469 words) - 16:14, 13 February 2013
• Opasnet randomized trial
  ...based on their main objective and group size, e.g. info producers vs. info users; and individuals working mostly alone, individuals working within a group t
  2 KB (236 words) - 08:24, 2 November 2010
• Health impacts of urban heat island mitigation in Europe
  ===Intended users===
  16 KB (2,347 words) - 12:55, 29 March 2011
• Health impact of radon in Europe
  Boundaries, scenarios, intended users, and participants are the same as in the [[Common Case Study]]. In brief, t
  25 KB (3,742 words) - 08:55, 27 August 2013
• Virtual government
  ...rnment]]. The invention can be utilised by anyone for any purpose, but all users should report their evaluation of the invention and their own use of it to
  3 KB (491 words) - 18:59, 20 December 2010
• Roles, tasks, and functionalities in Opasnet
  * Practical advice for users
  1 KB (150 words) - 22:03, 7 December 2010
• Effect of urban land use change on ambient air temperature
  ...tack|# |Lack some subheading in the contents and I added(question,intended users,participant,endpoints) in the content of the page |Sam0911]] 12:15, 17 Febr == Intended users ==
  6 KB (781 words) - 10:41, 17 February 2013
• Assessment of building policies' effect on dampness and asthma in Europe
  '''Boundaries, scenarios, intended users, and participants''' are the same as in the [[Mega case study|Common Case S
  21 KB (3,043 words) - 10:33, 26 August 2013
• Research about Opasnet content
  ...t''' describes possible ways to make scientific research about the use and users of [[Opasnet]]. This is not a page about making research within [[Opasnet]]
  1 KB (188 words) - 06:25, 29 December 2010
• Opasnet usage statistics
  User statistics, page views, Opasnet users, activity in Opasnet
  1 KB (141 words) - 12:50, 28 August 2015
• Opasnet FI usage statistics
  User statistics, page views, Opasnet users, activity in Opasnet,
  1 KB (116 words) - 12:36, 28 August 2015
• Opasnet WSA contest preparation
  ...of society, especially in governance. Opasnet is open to everyone and its users - citizens, scientists and decision makers - can contribute in various role ...so the quality and usefulness of the contributions can be evaluated by the users.
  19 KB (2,628 words) - 08:15, 1 June 2011
• Opasnet File
  .... Its purpose is to store files that are not meant to be edited by Opasnet users or used as images on [[Opasnet]] pages (these files are uploaded to Opasnet
  845 bytes (138 words) - 17:20, 26 January 2011
• Valamo conference 2007
  *enable participation of end-users and authorities in the aim to improve the science-policy interface, and sci
  15 KB (2,138 words) - 12:03, 9 February 2011
• Simulation Tool Kit for Indoor Air Quality and Inhalation Exposure (IAQX)
  ...IAQ simulation programs (such as RISK) and is designed mainly for advanced users. In addition to performing conventional IAQ simulations, which compute the
  692 bytes (93 words) - 10:30, 2 March 2011
• DARM DA study exercise group 3
  ===Intended users=== The intended users of assessment will be:
  9 KB (1,398 words) - 12:18, 12 April 2011
• DARM DA study exercise group 4
  ===Intended users=== ...ental Health Risk Assessment in the University of Eastern Finland. All the users of Opasnet are free to participate in this open assessment.
  9 KB (1,353 words) - 12:58, 9 April 2011
• DARM DA study exercise Group 1
  ===Intended users=== *Ministry of Social and Health Affairs of Finland and all opasnet users.
  17 KB (2,504 words) - 05:15, 8 April 2011
• DARM DA Study Exercise group 2
  ===Intended users===
  11 KB (1,657 words) - 17:02, 11 January 2016
• RM analysis June
  ...duced and applied. They therefore have potential for use by their intended users. ...addresses the question and the expected results are useful to the intended users. The expected results indicate that DALYs would be lower for decision to va
  11 KB (1,814 words) - 20:44, 11 April 2011
• Fukushima nuclear accident
  ===Intended users===
  2 KB (239 words) - 11:33, 13 March 2015
• Pragmatic knowledge services
  ...ic knowledge services, as hybrid systems of information technology and its users, are not only means for creation of practical knowledge, but vehicles of a ...sessment practices often remain a monologue of experts, where contact with users, other experts and public is taken only when obligatory [Pohjola MV, manusc
  75 KB (10,759 words) - 16:20, 4 March 2015
• A Tutorial on R
  d <- read.csv("C:/Users/Neukkari/AppData/Local/Temp/ArkS280.csv", sep = ";", dec = ",") write.table(rob, "C:/Users/Neukkari/Documents/koe.csv", sep = ",", dec = ".")
  25 KB (4,097 words) - 09:06, 19 December 2016
• Origins of the male attraction by motor sports sounds
  ...rying to achieve this sound - as viewed by the manufacturers, sellers, and users of such vehicles? Obviously, the view of particular interest is that of the '''users''' (of the vehicle), as they have made the decision to invest their money a
  3 KB (504 words) - 21:56, 7 September 2011
• Proast
  ...d to implement PROAST before it can be used. Further, it may be helpful if users learn some of the basic features of R.
  5 KB (728 words) - 11:06, 26 August 2013
• R-tools
  '''R-Tools''' is a MediaWiki extension that allows registered Opasnet users to run [http://www.r-project.org R] code directly from a wiki page. ...relevant. All variables are considered as text type by default, providing users a input field for writing. There are other possible types too (date, select
  14 KB (2,276 words) - 17:15, 6 May 2014
• Guidance system of the IEHIAS
  ...rpreting the results of the assessment, and communicating these to the end-users.
  9 KB (1,407 words) - 15:02, 14 October 2014
• Execution in the IEHIAS
  ...far too often the assessment practice still remains closed: contacts with users is kept to a minimum, collaboration within the community of experts is rare ...and decision making processes; assessors themselves and decision makers as users of the assessments. The prevailing assessment tradition is that assessments
  58 KB (8,932 words) - 18:55, 14 October 2014
• Appraisal in the IEHIAS
  ...n-makers in a form that they can understand. In many cases, also, the end-users may request help in interpreting the findings, and in further assessing the #Reporting the assessment results - i.e. delivering them to the end-users in a synthesised and understandable form;
  41 KB (6,628 words) - 19:01, 14 October 2014
• Formulating scenarios
  ...nding on the type of question that is being addressed and the needs of the users. No formal classification of assessments has been developed and agreed, bu ...et to rather sophisticated modelling and visualisation systems, that allow users to change key elements within the system, and estimate what the consequence
  13 KB (1,945 words) - 15:02, 14 October 2014
• Building a conceptual model
  ...mind-mapping have accordingly become more flexible and diverse. Non-expert users thus find them relatively easy to apply. ..., depending on the perspective adopted, and the interests and needs of the users. A wide array of different (and often overlapping or contradictory) typolo
  12 KB (1,898 words) - 18:40, 14 October 2014
• Issue framing in the IEHIAS
  ...r functionalities than the wiki, but because the wiki is the interface for users, Opasnet is often used as a synonym for the Opasnet wiki. Other major func ...ars in the top right corner of many Opasnet pages. Peer rating means that users are requested to evaluate the scientific quality and usefulness of that pag
  32 KB (4,983 words) - 15:02, 14 October 2014
• Budget Game GP 2011
  ...official negotiators putting together the Government Programme. Registered users were also able to directly record their goals in the wiki. Voluntary modera
  10 KB (1,617 words) - 13:41, 11 July 2011
• Modelling in Opasnet
  ** [[Decision]] An important page for advanced users. Update especially the rcode.
  30 KB (4,455 words) - 14:19, 11 April 2017
• Project management in Opasnet
  * [[Todo]] template for assigning tasks to workspace users. Each user has a personal task list containing all his/her tasks. In additi
  2 KB (353 words) - 12:57, 15 August 2011
• IEHIA of waste management in Lazio (Italy)
  ...des industry, central / regional governments, city councils, NGOs, service users, private sector, citizens, scientists and media. It should be noted that se
  61 KB (8,432 words) - 12:04, 14 February 2012
• Goodness of communication
  * Availability (Av): number of people (users) hearing the content N(content received)
  3 KB (390 words) - 10:51, 26 August 2013
• Diversity index
  setwd("/Users/hantuo/Documents/j1 Anun koinobiontit") # for iMac setwd("/Users/hantuo/Documents/j1 Isrraelin iknot") # for iMac
  39 KB (6,069 words) - 18:09, 9 February 2015
• Climate change policies and health in Kuopio
  ===Intended users=== * [[Urgenche]] researchers are users from the methodological point of view.
  48 KB (5,955 words) - 16:52, 11 January 2016
• Unbroken
  ...is updated, there must always be a fully functional model available to the users. Only when the update works, the current model is replaced by a new one.
  2 KB (303 words) - 09:45, 20 March 2012
• Object-oriented programming in Opasnet
  * it is easy to understand by non-expert users and contributors, ...variable) in [[R-tools]]. The wiki page is the user-friendly interface for users, and ovariable is the versatile format for efficient, standardised modellin
  32 KB (4,710 words) - 11:01, 26 August 2013
• Assessment studies
  and its users, are not only means for creation of practical knowledge, but vehicles of a ...as change in levels of carbon dioxide emissions. Results Compared with car users the estimated annual change in mortality of the Barcelona residents using B
  39 KB (5,542 words) - 13:09, 27 April 2012
• State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Economics and Marketing-Finance
  ...alogeras, 2010). For instance, to study the preferences and choices of end-users, consumers, in the food supply chain, it is important to understand how the
  87 KB (12,597 words) - 12:41, 20 April 2012
• Openness in participation, assessment, and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health: a review of literature and recent project results
  |Specified users (e.g. policy makers), and stakeholders (preferably by proxy) invited to par |Users and stakeholders can participate in scoping and design of assessment and in
  66 KB (9,194 words) - 06:27, 4 March 2015
• State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Environmental health
  |What are the results used for? Who are the users? ...ends at publication of results. Good results are assumed to be taken up by users without additional efforts.
  83 KB (12,155 words) - 14:35, 27 February 2015
• The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study
  '''Results''' Compared with car users the estimated annual change in car users. We did not consider the benefits of decreased car use
  36 KB (5,417 words) - 13:18, 27 April 2012
• State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: Food and nutrition
  available to registered users on the QALIBRA website. The user is brought under the attention of a wider scale of users. A benefit–
  140 KB (21,040 words) - 07:33, 4 March 2015
• Looking beyond borders: Integrating best practices in benefit–risk analysis into the field of Food and Nutrition
  web-based and free to users after completing a short online training and data with other users.
  109 KB (16,197 words) - 05:28, 4 March 2015
• WHO:Be mobile, active - and safe!
  ...ries, motorized two-wheelers, cyclists and pedestrians are vulnerable road users who have the highest crash fatality rate and deserve special attention. Chi
  42 KB (6,142 words) - 08:22, 15 June 2012
• WHO:Eliminating environmental health hazards
  ...s posed by chemicals and providing appropriate safety information to their users. Adverse health outcomes are a result of many factors including the compoun
  24 KB (3,583 words) - 09:41, 15 June 2012
• Training assessment
  ===Intended users===
  7 KB (1,043 words) - 20:01, 24 March 2015
• General criteria for land use
  the needs of the user, and few users will be satisfied with an inventory that does not meet most of their provide a framework to satisfy the needs of the majority of users, certain guidelines of criteria for
  5 KB (754 words) - 09:16, 14 June 2012
• Biofuel assessments
  ===Intended use and users===
  11 KB (1,762 words) - 08:28, 24 November 2012
• Detection of land, Random sampling in Urgenche
  the needs of the user, and few users will be satisfied with an inventory that does not meet most of their provide a framework to satisfy the needs of the majority of users, certain guidelines of criteria for
  4 KB (648 words) - 13:33, 26 June 2012
• Measuring user skills in Opasnet
  * the requirements and execution of evaluation are clear to all users,
  2 KB (320 words) - 09:17, 27 June 2012
• Properties of good assessment
  ...ell does the information provided by the assessment serve the needs of the users? Is the assessment question good? ...to users in terms of e.g. time, location, extent of information, extent of users.
  13 KB (1,876 words) - 10:28, 9 August 2012
• City-level climate policy model
  ===Intended users===
  17 KB (2,333 words) - 11:14, 26 August 2013
• Decision analysis and risk management 2013/Homework
  ====Intended use and users==== :''List of users that are supposed to need the assessment. Also, how do we expect them to us
  54 KB (8,096 words) - 15:40, 20 May 2013
• Wikisym 2013
  ...s) and how it can be used directly from wiki pages. This extension enables users to write R-code, run it and see the results of the calculation on the wiki For users who don't want to learn R-code we have developed a special user interface.
  7 KB (1,113 words) - 12:04, 20 August 2014
• Compound intake estimator
  Users who are skilful with R can download the whole model to their own computers
  37 KB (5,045 words) - 11:56, 22 February 2016
• Regenerating distributions
  if ql<0 %Intake is positive among users/consumers
  3 KB (401 words) - 17:52, 3 December 2013
• Horizon 2020
  ...d impacts: In the short term, open and wide-spread access of citizens, end-users stakeholders to on-line services providing processes and methods for knowle
  24 KB (3,378 words) - 14:04, 29 April 2014
• Open policy practice
  ...ributes for the [[assessment#Answer|assessment scope]]: question, intended users and use, participants, boundaries, decisions and scenarios, and timing. In | How well does the assessment address the intended needs of the users? Is the assessment question good in relation to the purpose of the assessme
  46 KB (6,852 words) - 13:01, 20 June 2017
• Plantlibra deliverable DWP5-6
  an internet based interface where users can access, combine, by plant and compound, and where users can access, combine, by plant and compound, and discuss information for ris
  30 KB (4,173 words) - 11:29, 22 February 2016
• Health risks of mobile phones
  ...ell phone use, but excess risk in a small subgroup of more heavily exposed users associated with latency and laterality was reported. So far, the published
  6 KB (931 words) - 11:33, 13 March 2015
• Pneumococcal vaccine products
  What information should users have on different pneumococcal vaccine products (Prevenar 13 and Synflorix)
  11 KB (1,644 words) - 09:07, 23 August 2014
• Finnish vaccination schedule
  What information should users have on the Finnish vaccination schedule before making the decision?
  2 KB (181 words) - 13:21, 21 August 2014
• European soil database
  ...ameters. The 10km x 10km rasters are in the public domain and allow expert users to use the data for mapping and modelling. The 1km x 1km rasters are availa
  9 KB (1,378 words) - 19:02, 25 September 2014
• Photovoltaic Geographic Information System
  The interface (see figure) allows users to browse by type of data, city and geographical coordinates or to use the
  3 KB (466 words) - 19:03, 25 September 2014
• International Road Traffic and Accident Database
  *Hospitalised road users by road usage, age bands or road network;
  2 KB (286 words) - 19:17, 25 September 2014
• European Detailed Mortality Database
  ...a user-friendly tool for accessing the detailed mortality data by allowing users to define and retrieve the required data by any combination of 3-digit ICD-
  2 KB (246 words) - 19:17, 25 September 2014
• Modelling road transport in Helsinki and Hague
  ...ki Metropolitan Area Council.] Paper presented to 20th International Emme Users' Conference, Montreal.
  6 KB (898 words) - 20:07, 25 September 2014
• IEHIAS Indicator selection
  ...nd care is needed in balancing the demands for relevance (on behalf of the users) and interpretability in terms of the science. ...being assessed, in order to make sure that they are relevant. Otherwise, users will be faced with irrelevant information which may cause confusion or dist
  8 KB (1,228 words) - 20:30, 25 September 2014
• IEHIAS tools for scenario construction
  # Specific tools, designed to help users create scenarios on defined issues
  5 KB (712 words) - 13:54, 13 October 2014
• Focal sum modelling in IEHIAS
  .../d2 where d = distance) for the kernel file can be specified by the user. Users may also wish to apply existing kernel files either manually created or der The model provided here allows GIS users quickly to model ambient pollution concentrations, as a proxy for exposure,
  5 KB (694 words) - 13:54, 13 October 2014
• IEHIAS spatial visualisation toolbox
  The tool is designed to be used by non-expert and expert users alike. It is set up so that just by one click on the button associated with ...hin Geographical Information Systems and is thus easy to utilise for basic users. From a single click data is geo-referenced, styled and displayed in a map
  8 KB (1,272 words) - 13:54, 13 October 2014
• Chemical mass balance models
  ...PA-CMB8.2 [http://www.epa.gov/scram001/models/receptor/EPA-CMB82Manual.pdf Users Manual. Research Triangle Park], NC: USEPA.
  6 KB (948 words) - 13:54, 13 October 2014
• RISK IAQ model
  ...commonly used parameter estimation methods in one place; second, it saves users time by taking over tedious calculations.
  7 KB (1,085 words) - 14:13, 13 October 2014
• PBPK model for cadmium
  ...ently implemented, does not provide a user interface or usage guide. Model users should be at least somewhat familiar with Matlab coding to adapt the code f
  7 KB (1,141 words) - 14:13, 13 October 2014
• Decision Support Tools metadatabase
  Users can upload their own DSTs. The metabatabase has two search options, either
  2 KB (340 words) - 14:58, 14 October 2014
• Concepts for integrated monitoring
  ...compatible in different systems or databases, and can use across time and users (Martin, 1986). ...rces that have relevant information contributing to the achievement of the users' goals (AFT, 1997).
  10 KB (1,440 words) - 15:01, 14 October 2014
• IEHIAS causal chain
  ...depend on the type of issue being considered, as well as the needs of the users involved. The diagram below shows a simple causal chain for pollution-bas
  4 KB (630 words) - 18:40, 14 October 2014
• Selecting indicators in IEHIAS
  ...far beyond what many users will need or be able to cope with. For most users, therefore, a more limited set of synoptic information is required, which c ...re that the indicators do justice to the assessment, and meet the needs of users, they need to be selected and constructed with great care. Clear and stric
  11 KB (1,742 words) - 18:40, 14 October 2014
• Accuracy and uncertainty
  ...ty analysis is therefore an attempt to explore and describe the unknown. Users also often have a very shaky appreciation of both the conceptual and statis
  4 KB (630 words) - 18:44, 14 October 2014
• Value systems
  ...rs, in order to ensure that the assessment will be relevant to the various users it is meant to serve. Exactly what value systems might be involved, and h
  4 KB (554 words) - 18:45, 14 October 2014
• Geographic location and extent
  ...trations. Where the location of an assessment is predefined (e.g. by the users who commissioned it), then the results should not be extrapolated to other
  3 KB (513 words) - 18:45, 14 October 2014
• Spatial resolution
  ...can make the results difficult to interpret, especially for non-specialist users. #* enables users to identify relevant variations in the impacts (e.g. local hotspots) that m
  6 KB (882 words) - 18:49, 14 October 2014
• Contaminant sources in IEHIAS
  *operational numbers (e.g. numbers of workers employed; numbers of road users; livestock numbers; numbers of households or residents);
  17 KB (2,633 words) - 18:54, 14 October 2014
• Piloting: Defining and describing uncertainties
  ...in order to ensure that key sources of uncertainty are not missed and that users can understand how they arise and what their implications might be. In par
  10 KB (1,550 words) - 18:54, 14 October 2014
• Uncertainty analysis in IEHIAS
  ...in order to ensure that key sources of uncertainty are not missed and that users can understand how they arise and what their implications might be. In par ...e methods may have to be used because of the limitations of the data. Many users may also find qualitative measures more easy to understand: often, therefor
  28 KB (4,275 words) - 19:01, 14 October 2014
• Exposure modelling in IEHIAS
  Deterministic methods are often preferred by users, because they are easier to apply and appear to give explicit answers. The
  25 KB (3,719 words) - 18:58, 14 October 2014
• Impact analysis in IEHIAS
  ...st appropriate will depend on the purpose of the analysis and needs of the users. Ideally, the indicators to be used will have been identified at the Issue ...these underlying principles may not be shared (or fully understood) by all users of the assessment results, care is needed both in using and communicating t
  15 KB (2,289 words) - 18:58, 14 October 2014
• Shared information objects in policy support
  ! Intended use and users ...lex variable parameters should be explained in sufficient detail to enable users to understand and use the tool's functionality.
  38 KB (5,804 words) - 15:21, 20 October 2015
• Decision analysis and risk management 2015/Homework
  * How can you ensure that the outcomes are useful for the users? ...rk list on top of this page (the last on the list shall pick the first two users on the list and the second last on the list shall pick the last and the fir
  45 KB (6,500 words) - 14:12, 22 May 2015
• Open science and research roadmap 2014–2017
  ...romoting service design and usability via bottom-up workshops. Identifying users’ special requirements. || ATT initiative/system architecture working grou ...:Jouni|Jouni]] ([[User talk:Jouni|talk]]) 11:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)}}|| Users’ special needs must be identified, and they must be involved and encourag
  68 KB (9,605 words) - 16:53, 11 January 2016
• The open science and research handbook
  * measures for both providers and users ...refers to unrestricted access to digital content and data that users may use, amend and distribute without charge. To meet the criter
  37 KB (4,628 words) - 12:00, 22 January 2015
• Assessments are to change the world
  ...ssment can be difficult to obtain. Particularly engagement of the intended users of assessment results, e.g policy makers or industrial decision makers, rem ...d learning and adapting to each other’s needs from both policy makers as users of knowledge and researchers as suppliers of knowledge (van Egmond et al. 2
  61 KB (8,523 words) - 16:41, 4 March 2015

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)